MEDLINE Journals

    Rim versus sagittal mandibulectomy for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma: two types of mandibular preservation.

    Guerra MF, Campo FJ, Gías LN, et al. 
    Head Neck 2003 Dec; 25(12) :982-9.

    The role of conservative mandibulectomy for patients with bone invasion from squamous cell carcinoma remains poorly defined. However, marginal mandibular resection is biomechanically secure in its design while maintaining the mandibular continuity. This procedure has proven to be a successful method of treating squamous cell carcinoma with limited mandibular involvement.The purpose of this study was to analyze our results after the use of a marginal technique for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancer and to compare two types of mandibular conservative procedures: rim resection versus sagittal inner mandibulectomy.A retrospective review of a cohort of 50 patients (global group) who underwent mandibular conservative resection for previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma was performed. Two subgroups were considered: rim group (n = 37) and sagittal group (n = 13). Clinical evaluation and preoperative radiologic studies were the means used to evaluate bony invasion and to decide on the extent of mandibulectomy. The treatment outcome after these two types of mandibular resection was calculated and compared using analysis by the Pearson chi(2) test, logistic regression model for multivariate analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method to determine survival. RESULTS.: In the sagittal group, specimens from 2 patients (11.7%) demonstrated tumor invasion on decalcified histologic examination, whereas the rim group showed 11 cases (29.7%) with bone invasion. Local recurrence was observed in the follow-up of 10 patients. No statistical relationship was found between the presence of histologic bone invasion and the risk of local recurrence. The size of bone resection >4 cm (p =.002) and tumor invasion of surgical margins (p =.039) were found to be associated with increased local recurrence rates. In multivariate analysis, lymph node affectation significantly correlated with histologic mandibular involvement (p =.02). In the global group, the 5-year observed survival rate was 56.97%. Overall survival and rate of recurrence were comparable in both groups. In the global group, tumor infiltration beyond the surgical margin was statistically related with poor survival (p =.01).Analysis of this series disclosed that marginal mandibulectomy is effective in the control of squamous cell carcinomas that are close to or involving the mandible. In carefully selected patients, sagittal bone resection seems to be as appropriate as rim resection in the local control of these tumors.

    Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
    Middle Aged
    Mouth Neoplasms
    Neoplasm Invasiveness
    Neoplasm Staging
    Oral Surgical Procedures
    Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
    Retrospective Studies


    Pub Type(s)
    Comparative Study Evaluation Studies Journal Article
    PubMed ID


    Content Manager
    Related Content

    Marginal and segmental mandibulectomy in patients with oral cancer: a statistical analysis of 106 cases.

    Influence of bone invasion and extent of mandibular resection on local control of cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

    Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of mandibular involvement in oral-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study.

    Posterior marginal mandibulectomy in the management of cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

    Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival.

    Prognostic implications of mandibular invasion in oral cancer.

    [On the indications for and morbidity of segmental resection of the mandible for squamous cell carcinoma in the lower oral cavity].

    Histological pattern of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma.