MEDLINE Journals

    When early enteral feeding is not possible in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter observational study.

    Authors

    Cahill NE, Murch L, Jeejeebhoy K, et al. 

    Source

    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011 Mar; 35(2) :160-8.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND
    Early enteral nutrition (EN) is the preferred strategy for feeding the critically ill; however, it is not always possible to initiate EN within the recommended 24 to 48 hours. When these situations arise, controversy exists whether to start feeding early via the parenteral route or to delay feeding until EN can be provided.
    METHODS
    A multicenter, international, observational study examined nutrition practices in intensive care units (ICUs). Eligible patients were critically ill patients with a medical diagnosis who remained in the ICU for >72 hours and received EN >48 hours after admission. Data were collected on site, including patient characteristics, daily nutrition practices, and outcomes at 60 days. Nutrition and clinical outcomes were compared between 3 groups of patients: (1) early parenteral nutrition (PN) (<48 hours after admission) and late EN (>48 hours after admission), (2) late PN and late EN, and (3) late EN and no PN.
    RESULTS
    Of the 703 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 541 (77.0%) medical patients received late EN and no PN. In patients receiving late EN and PN, 83 (11.8%) received early PN and 79 (11.2%) received late PN. Adequacy of calories and protein from total nutrition was highest in the early PN group (74.1% ± 21.2% and 71.5% ± 24.9%, respectively) and lowest in the late EN group (42.9% ± 21.2% and 38.7% ± 21.6%) (P < .001). The proportion of patients dead or remaining in hospital was significantly higher for early PN compared with late EN and PN (unadjusted hazard ratio for early PN = 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.83, P = .015). However, this difference did not remain significant (P = .65) after adjustment for baseline characteristics.
    CONCLUSIONS
    The results suggest that initiating PN early, when it is not possible to feed enterally early, may improve provision of calories and protein but is not associated with better clinical outcomes compared with late EN or PN.

    Mesh

    Adult
    Aged
    Critical Illness
    Energy Intake
    Enteral Nutrition
    Female
    Humans
    Intensive Care
    Length of Stay
    Male
    Middle Aged
    Observation
    Parenteral Nutrition
    Prevalence
    Proportional Hazards Models
    Protein-Energy Malnutrition

    Language

    eng

    Pub Type(s)

    Journal Article Multicenter Study

    PubMed ID

    21378245

    Content Manager
    Related Content

    Early use of supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study.

    Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients.

    Does enteral nutrition compared to parenteral nutrition result in better outcomes in critically ill adult patients? A systematic review of the literature.

    Enteral nutrition versus glucose-based or lipid-based parenteral nutrition and tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients.

    Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial.

    Nutrition of the critically ill patient and effects of implementing a nutritional support algorithm in ICU.

    Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults.

    Nutrition support in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of the literature.