Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Using SNOMED CT to represent two interface terminologies.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb; 16(1):81-8.JAMIA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Interface terminologies are designed to support interactions between humans and structured medical information. In particular, many interface terminologies have been developed for structured computer based documentation systems. Experts and policy-makers have recommended that interface terminologies be mapped to reference terminologies. The goal of the current study was to evaluate how well the reference terminology SNOMED CT could map to and represent two interface terminologies, MEDCIN and the Categorical Health Information Structured Lexicon (CHISL).

DESIGN

Automated mappings between SNOMED CT and 500 terms from each of the two interface terminologies were evaluated by human reviewers, who also searched SNOMED CT to identify better mappings when this was judged to be necessary. Reviewers judged whether they believed the interface terms to be clinically appropriate, whether the terms were covered by SNOMED CT concepts and whether the terms' implied semantic structure could be represented by SNOMED CT.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes included concept coverage by SNOMED CT for study terms and their implied semantics. Agreement statistics and compositionality measures were calculated.

RESULTS

The SNOMED CT terminology contained concepts to represent 92.4% of MEDCIN and 95.9% of CHISL terms. Semantic structures implied by study terms were less well covered, with some complex compositional expressions requiring semantics not present in SNOMED CT. Among sampled terms, those from MEDCIN were more complex than those from CHISL, containing an average 3.8 versus 1.8 atomic concepts respectively, p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support using SNOMED CT to provide standardized representations of information created using these two terminologies, but suggest that enriching SNOMED CT semantics would improve representation of the external terms.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville-TN, USA. trent.rosenbloom@vanderbilt.eduNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18952944

Citation

Rosenbloom, S Trent, et al. "Using SNOMED CT to Represent Two Interface Terminologies." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, vol. 16, no. 1, 2009, pp. 81-8.
Rosenbloom ST, Brown SH, Froehling D, et al. Using SNOMED CT to represent two interface terminologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(1):81-8.
Rosenbloom, S. T., Brown, S. H., Froehling, D., Bauer, B. A., Wahner-Roedler, D. L., Gregg, W. M., & Elkin, P. L. (2009). Using SNOMED CT to represent two interface terminologies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 16(1), 81-8. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2694
Rosenbloom ST, et al. Using SNOMED CT to Represent Two Interface Terminologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):81-8. PubMed PMID: 18952944.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Using SNOMED CT to represent two interface terminologies. AU - Rosenbloom,S Trent, AU - Brown,Steven H, AU - Froehling,David, AU - Bauer,Brent A, AU - Wahner-Roedler,Dietlind L, AU - Gregg,William M, AU - Elkin,Peter L, Y1 - 2008/10/24/ PY - 2008/10/28/entrez PY - 2008/10/28/pubmed PY - 2009/1/28/medline SP - 81 EP - 8 JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA JO - J Am Med Inform Assoc VL - 16 IS - 1 N2 - OBJECTIVE: Interface terminologies are designed to support interactions between humans and structured medical information. In particular, many interface terminologies have been developed for structured computer based documentation systems. Experts and policy-makers have recommended that interface terminologies be mapped to reference terminologies. The goal of the current study was to evaluate how well the reference terminology SNOMED CT could map to and represent two interface terminologies, MEDCIN and the Categorical Health Information Structured Lexicon (CHISL). DESIGN: Automated mappings between SNOMED CT and 500 terms from each of the two interface terminologies were evaluated by human reviewers, who also searched SNOMED CT to identify better mappings when this was judged to be necessary. Reviewers judged whether they believed the interface terms to be clinically appropriate, whether the terms were covered by SNOMED CT concepts and whether the terms' implied semantic structure could be represented by SNOMED CT. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included concept coverage by SNOMED CT for study terms and their implied semantics. Agreement statistics and compositionality measures were calculated. RESULTS: The SNOMED CT terminology contained concepts to represent 92.4% of MEDCIN and 95.9% of CHISL terms. Semantic structures implied by study terms were less well covered, with some complex compositional expressions requiring semantics not present in SNOMED CT. Among sampled terms, those from MEDCIN were more complex than those from CHISL, containing an average 3.8 versus 1.8 atomic concepts respectively, p<0.001. CONCLUSION: Our findings support using SNOMED CT to provide standardized representations of information created using these two terminologies, but suggest that enriching SNOMED CT semantics would improve representation of the external terms. SN - 1067-5027 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18952944/Using_SNOMED_CT_to_represent_two_interface_terminologies_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-lookup/doi/10.1197/jamia.M2694 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -