Disparity in infection control practices for multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
There is a lack of empiric evidence regarding the optimal approach to controlling the transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing
Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). In this context, we expect that infection control
practices for these organisms vary widely between hospitals.
METHODS
A survey examining infection control practices for ESBL-E and CRE was distributed to 6 academic and 9 community hospitals
in Toronto, Canada.
RESULTS
All hospitals responded to the survey. Among 15 hospitals in 1 geographic area, 8 different approaches to the management of
ESBL-E were utilized. There was wide variation in the use infection control practices including admission screening (53% and
53%), contact precautions (53% and 100%), and isolation (60% and 100%) for ESBL-E and CRE, respectively. Of hospitals performing
admission screening, 75% used risk factor-based screening for ESBL-E and CRE.
CONCLUSION
Even within a single geographic area, there is wide variation in infection control strategies to contain or control ESBL-E
and CRE. These results are concerning given evidence that a coordinated approach may be required to prevent or limit the emergence
of CRE.
Links
Authors
Lowe C, Katz K, McGeer A, Muller MP, Toronto ESBL Working Group
Institution
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Source
American journal of infection control 40:9 2012 Nov pg 836-9MeSH
CanadaDrug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Enterobacteriaceae
Enterobacteriaceae Infections
Health Services Research
Hospitals, Community
Hospitals, University
Humans
Infection Control
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleLanguage
eng
PubMed ID
22361360
Log In

