Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Sample sizes for obstetrical trials are often based on the opinion of investigators about clinically important effect size.
We surveyed Canadian obstetricians to investigate clinically important effect sizes required before introducing new treatments
into practice to prevent preterm birth.
METHODS
Questionnaires were mailed to practicing obstetricians, asking the magnitude of pregnancy prolongation required to introduce
treatments into practice. The three prophylactic treatments were of increasing invasiveness: vaginal progesterone, intramuscular
progesterone, and cervical cerclage. We also asked about the perceived most relevant outcome measures for obstetrical trials
and current obstetrical practice in preterm birth prevention.
RESULTS
544/1293(42.1%) completed questionnaires were received. The majority of respondents required one or two weeks' increase in
length of gestation before introducing vaginal (372,77.1%), and intramuscular progesterone(354,67.9%). At least three weeks
increase was required before introducing prophylactic cervical cerclage(326,62.8%). Clinicians who already used a treatment
required a smaller difference before introducing it into practice. Decreasing neonatal morbidity was cited as the most important
outcome for obstetrical trials (349,72.2%).
CONCLUSION
Obstetricians would require a larger increase in treatment effect before introducing more invasive treatments into practice.
Although infant morbidity was perceived as a more important outcome, clinicians appeared willing to change practice on the
basis of prolongation of pregnancy, a surrogate outcome. We found that there is not a single minimum clinically important
treatment effect that will influence all practising clinicians: rather the effect size that will influence physicians is affected
by the nature of the treatment, the reported outcome measure and the clinician's own current clinical practice.
Links
Authors
Ross S, Milne J, Dwinnell S, Tang S, Wood S
Institution
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. sue.ross@albertahealthservices.ca
Source
BMC medical research methodology 12: 2012 pg 31MeSH
Administration, IntravaginalCanada
Cerclage, Cervical
Clinical Trials as Topic
Decision Making
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Obstetrics
Physician's Practice Patterns
Physicians
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy, Multiple
Pregnancy, Prolonged
Premature Birth
Progesterone
Questionnaires
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research Design
Sample Size
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22429514
Log In

