Epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline in subacute sciatica: a multicenter, randomized trial.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Perineural inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor have recently generated intense interest as an alternative to epidural steroid
injections for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline better improves pain and function in adults with lumbosacral
radiculopathy.
DESIGN
A multicenter, 3-group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from 2008 to 2011. Randomization was computer-generated
and stratified by site. Pharmacists prepared the syringes. Patients, treating physicians, and nurses assessing outcomes were
blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00733096)
SETTING
Military and civilian treatment centers.
PATIENTS
84 adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy of less than 6 months' duration.
INTERVENTION
2 epidural injections of steroids, etanercept, or saline, mixed with bupivacaine and separated by 2 weeks.
MEASUREMENTS
The primary outcome measure was leg pain 1 month after the second injection. All patients had 1-month follow-up visits; patients
whose condition improved remained blinded for the 6-month study period.
RESULTS
The group that received epidural steroids had greater reductions in the primary outcome measure than those who received saline
(mean difference, -1.26 [95% CI, -2.79 to 0.27]; P = 0.11) or etanercept (mean difference, -1.01 [CI, -2.60 to 0.58]; P =
0.21). For back pain, smaller differences favoring steroids compared with saline (mean difference, -0.52 [CI, -1.85 to 0.81];
P = 0.44) and etanercept (mean difference, -0.92 [CI,-2.28 to 0.44]; P = 0.18) were observed. The largest differences were
noted for functional capacity, in which etanercept fared worse than the other treatments: steroids vs. etanercept (mean difference,
-16.16 [CI, -26.05 to -6.27]; P = 0.002), steroids vs. saline (mean difference, -5.87 [CI, -15.59 to 3.85]; P = 0.23), and
etanercept vs. saline (mean difference, 10.29 [CI, 0.55 to 20.04]; P = 0.04). More patients treated with epidural steroids
(75%) reported 50% or greater leg pain relief and a positive global perceived effect at 1 month than those who received saline
(50%) or etanercept (42%) (P = 0.09).
LIMITATION
Short-term follow-up, small sample size, and a possibly subtherapeutic dose of etanercept.
CONCLUSION
Epidural steroid injections may provide modest short-term pain relief for some adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy, but
larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm their benefits.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
The John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute, International Spinal Intervention Society, and Center for Rehabilitation
Sciences Research.
Links
Authors
Cohen SP, White RL, Kurihara C, Larkin TM, Chang A, Griffith SR, Gilligan C, Larkin R, Morlando B, Pasquina PF, Yaksh TL, Nguyen C
Institution
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. scohen40@jhmi.edu
Source
Annals of internal medicine 156:8 2012 Apr 17 pg 551-9MeSH
AdultAnesthetics, Local
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
Bupivacaine
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin G
Injections, Epidural
Male
Methylprednisolone
Middle Aged
Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor
Sciatica
Sodium Chloride
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleMulticenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22508732
Log In

