Clinical utility of the mood and anxiety symptom questionnaire in a chinese sample of patients with pancreatic cancer.
Abstract
A review of the literature indicates a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with pancreatic carcinoma compared with nonclinical populations. The aims of this study were to evaluate the tripartite model for assessing symptoms of depression and anxiety and develop a Chinese version of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire-Short Form (MASQ-SF) in patients with pancreatic cancer. The final sample consisted of 1,029 patients with pancreatic cancer. In line with our hypothesis, results of confirmatory factor analysis suggest that the three factors identified fit the hypothesized tripartite model well. The Chinese version of the MASQ-SF also exhibited high internal consistency. Reliability of the three scales was excellent with all scores greater than .79. Cronbach's alpha for the total MASQ-SF was .88. The 1-month test-retest reliability was .80. Correlation coefficients among the three subscales ranged from .36 to .75. Thus, the Chinese version of the MASQ-SF exhibited high levels of reliability and validity, indicating that the Chinese version of the MASQ-SF is appropriate for assessing symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with pancreatic cancer. The use of this instrument may help researchers to better measure depression and anxiety in patients with pancreatic cancer and consequently develop appropriate prevention and treatment interventions.
Links
Authors
Institution
Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Source
Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates 35:3 pg 193-8MeSH
Age DistributionAged
Anxiety Disorders
China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depressive Disorder
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mood Disorders
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Prevalence
Psychometrics
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Sampling Studies
Sex Distribution
Sickness Impact Profile
Pub Type(s)
Comparative StudyJournal Article
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22647799
Log In

