In vitro resistance to macrolides and clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus isolated from pregnant and nonpregnant women.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Despite the introduction of screening bases intrapartum prophylaxis, Streptococcus agalactiae is still an important etiological
agent of perinatal infections. The increasing rate of resistance and the differences in resistance pattern among countries
suggest that a program of surveillance at the institutional level is important in determining optimal prophylaxis. In contrast,
knowledge on GBS epidemiology in Italy is limited, and no data are available in the Southern region of the country. We sought
to determine the occurrence of resistance to macrolides and clindamycin of GBS isolates in pregnant and nonpregnant women.
METHODS
Between 2005 and 2008, 1346 vaginal and 810 rectovaginal swabs were obtained from pregnant and not-pregnant women.
RESULTS
The occurrence of macrolides and clindamycin resistance was 16.5% in 2005 increasing up to 69.9% in 2008. A high percentage
of isolates was resistant to tetracycline through all the study period with no statistically significant annual.
CONCLUSIONS
In our cohort, an increase of in vitro resistance of GBS to macrolides and clindamycin is clearly evident. The discordance
with reports from different countries emphasize the crucial role of microbiological methods in setting possible therapeutic
strategies.
Links
Authors
Lambiase A, Agangi A, Del Pezzo M, Quaglia F, Testa A, Rossano F, Martinelli P, Catania MR
Institution
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Pathology Luigi Califano, "Federico II" University of Naples, Italy.
Source
Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology 2012: 2012 pg 913603MeSH
AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents
Clindamycin
Female
Humans
Italy
Macrolides
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Pregnancy
Rectum
Streptococcus agalactiae
Vagina
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleLanguage
eng
PubMed ID
22675244
Log In

