Effect of empirical treatment with moxifloxacin and meropenem vs meropenem on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized trial.
Abstract
CONTEXT
Early appropriate antimicrobial therapy leads to lower mortality rates associated with severe sepsis. The role of empirical
combination therapy comprising at least 2 antibiotics of different mechanisms remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effect of moxifloxacin and meropenem with the effect of meropenem alone on sepsis-related organ dysfunction.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS
A randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial of 600 patients who fulfilled criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock (n
= 298 for monotherapy and n = 302 for combination therapy). The trial was performed at 44 intensive care units in Germany
from October 16, 2007, to March 23, 2010. The number of evaluable patients was 273 in the monotherapy group and 278 in the
combination therapy group.
INTERVENTIONS
Intravenous meropenem (1 g every 8 hours) and moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 hours) or meropenem alone. The intervention was
recommended for 7 days and up to a maximum of 14 days after randomization or until discharge from the intensive care unit
or death, whichever occurred first.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Degree of organ failure (mean of daily total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] scores over 14 days; score range:
0-24 points with higher scores indicating worse organ failure); secondary outcome: 28-day and 90-day all-cause mortality.
Survivors were followed up for 90 days.
RESULTS
Among 551 evaluable patients, there was no statistically significant difference in mean SOFA score between the meropenem and
moxifloxacin group (8.3 points; 95% CI, 7.8-8.8 points) and the meropenem alone group (7.9 points; 95% CI, 7.5-8.4 points)
(P = .36). The rates for 28-day and 90-day mortality also were not statistically significantly different. By day 28, there
were 66 deaths (23.9%; 95% CI, 19.0%-29.4%) in the combination therapy group compared with 59 deaths (21.9%; 95% CI, 17.1%-27.4%)
in the monotherapy group (P = .58). By day 90, there were 96 deaths (35.3%; 95% CI, 29.6%-41.3%) in the combination therapy
group compared with 84 deaths (32.1%; 95% CI, 26.5%-38.1%) in the monotherapy group (P = .43).
CONCLUSION
Among adult patients with severe sepsis, treatment with combined meropenem and moxifloxacin compared with meropenem alone
did not result in less organ failure.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00534287.
Links
Authors
Brunkhorst FM, Oppert M, Marx G, Bloos F, Ludewig K, Putensen C, Nierhaus A, Jaschinski U, Meier-Hellmann A, Weyland A, Gründling M, Moerer O, Riessen R, Seibel A, Ragaller M, Büchler MW, John S, Bach F, Spies C, Reill L, Fritz H, Kiehntopf M, Kuhnt E, Bogatsch H, Engel C, Loeffler M, Kollef MH, Reinhart K, Welte T, German Study Group Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet)
Institution
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Source
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 307:22 2012 Jun 13 pg 2390-9MeSH
AgedAnti-Bacterial Agents
Aza Compounds
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Organ Failure
Quinolines
Sepsis
Shock, Septic
Survival Analysis
Thienamycins
Treatment Outcome
Pub Type(s)
Comparative StudyJournal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22692171
Log In

