Abstract
BACKGROUND
Although several studies have assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism with newer hormonal contraception, few have examined
thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, and results have been conflicting.
METHODS
In this 15-year Danish historical cohort study, we followed nonpregnant women, 15 to 49 years old, with no history of cardiovascular
disease or cancer. Data on use of hormonal contraception, clinical end points, and potential confounders were obtained from
four national registries.
RESULTS
A total of 1,626,158 women contributed 14,251,063 person-years of observation, during which 3311 thrombotic strokes (21.4
per 100,000 person-years) and 1725 myocardial infarctions (10.1 per 100,000 person-years) occurred. As compared with nonuse,
current use of oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg was associated with the following
relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, according to progestin type:
norethindrone, 2.2 (1.5 to 3.2) and 2.3 (1.3 to 3.9); levonorgestrel, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.0) and 2.0 (1.6 to 2.5); norgestimate,
1.5 (1.2 to 1.9) and 1.3 (0.9 to 1.9); desogestrel, 2.2 (1.8 to 2.7) and 2.1 (1.5 to 2.8); gestodene, 1.8 (1.6 to 2.0) and
1.9 (1.6 to 2.3); and drospirenone, 1.6 (1.2 to 2.2) and 1.7 (1.0 to 2.6), respectively. With ethinyl estradiol at a dose
of 20 μg, the corresponding relative risks according to progestin type were as follows: desogestrel, 1.5 (1.3 to 1.9) and
1.6 (1.1 to 2.1); gestodene, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.1) and 1.2 (0.8 to 1.9); and drospirenone, 0.9 (0.2 to 3.5) and 0.0. For transdermal
patches, the corresponding relative risks were 3.2 (0.8 to 12.6) and 0.0, and for a vaginal ring, 2.5 (1.4 to 4.4) and 2.1
(0.7 to 6.5).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the absolute risks of thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction associated with the use of hormonal contraception
were low, the risk was increased by a factor of 0.9 to 1.7 with oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose
of 20 μg and by a factor of 1.3 to 2.3 with those that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg, with relatively
small differences in risk according to progestin type. (Funded by the Danish Heart Association.).
Links
Authors
Lidegaard Ø, Løkkegaard E, Jensen A, Skovlund CW, Keiding N
Institution
Gynecologic Clinic 4232, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. lidegaard@rh.regionh.dk
Source
The New England journal of medicine 366:24 2012 Jun 14 pg 2257-66MeSH
Administration, CutaneousAdolescent
Adult
Cohort Studies
Contraceptive Agents
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined
Educational Status
Estradiol
Female
Humans
Incidence
Intracranial Thrombosis
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
Progestins
Regression Analysis
Risk
Smoking
Stroke
Thrombosis
Young Adult
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22693997
Log In

