Steady-state and time-dependent thermodynamic modeling of the effect of intravenous infusion of warm and cold fluids.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Hypothermia results in vital sign lability, coagulopathy, wound infections, and other sequelae. Normothermia can be restored
by several modalities, including passive blanket heating, warm forced-air devices, and active fluid warming (AFW). In AFW,
intravenously administered fluids are heated to 40 to 45 °C to minimize net thermal losses and to raise body temperature.
Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of AFW as part of a strategy encompassing several methods, but the isolated
contribution of AFW to warming has not been theoretically examined in detail.
METHODS
A calorimetric model is derived to determine the functional dependence of warming on patient weight, hypothermia severity,
infusion temperature, and volume infused. A second heat transfer model is derived to describe the time-dependent temperature
changes of the periphery and core after warmed-fluid infusion.
RESULTS
There is an inverse linear relationship between the patient's initial temperature and the amount of warming achieved with
a given volume. In contrast, as the temperature of the infusion approaches the desired final temperature, the volume required
for a fixed temperature change increases nonlinearly. For weight-based boluses, the temperature change scales appropriately
with patient mass. Infusion of 2 L of room-temperature crystalloid results in a decrease in body temperature of approximately
one-third degree Celsius in the average normothermic adult. For the heat transfer model, previously reported rates of temperature
drop and recovery after the intravenous infusion of cold fluids are qualitatively reproduced with a blood mixing time of approximately
15 minutes.
CONCLUSION
Our calculations reveal that AFW has a larger measurable beneficial effect for patients with more severe hypothermia, but
true rewarming of the patient with AFW alone would require prohibitively large fluid volumes (more than 10 L of 40 °C fluid)
or dangerously hot fluid (20 mL/kg of 80 °C fluid for a 1 °C increase). The major beneficial effect of AFW is the prevention
of further net heat loss.
Links
Authors
Institution
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90027, USA.
Source
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 72:6 2012 Jun pg 1590-600MeSH
Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdult
Body Temperature
Body Temperature Regulation
Cold Temperature
Female
Fluid Therapy
Hot Temperature
Humans
Hypothermia
Infusions, Intravenous
Injury Severity Score
Male
Models, Theoretical
Resuscitation
Rewarming
Risk Assessment
Survival Rate
Thermodynamics
Time Factors
Wounds and Injuries
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22695427
Log In

