Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Review published studies and critiques which evaluate the impact and effects of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)
Sleep Scoring Manual in the four years since its publication.
FINDINGS
USING THE AASM MANUAL RULES TO SCORE SLEEP AND EVENTS IN A POLYSOMNOGRAM (PSG) RESULTS IN: (1) very large differences in apnea-hypopnea
indexes (AHI) when using the recommended and alternative rule for scoring hypopneas in adults; (2) increases in NREM 1 and
sleep stage shifts with compensatory decreases in NREM 2 in children and adults when following rule 5.C.b. for ending NREM
2 sleep; (3) increases in NREM 3 in adults scoring slow wave activity in the frontal EEG derivations; (4) improved interscorer
reliability; and (5) successfully identified fragmented sleep in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from primary
snorers or normal controls because they had more NREM 1 and stage shifts using rule 5.C.b. Criticism of the Manual most often
cited: (1) two rules for scoring hypopneas; (2) alternative EEG montage cancellation effects; (3) scoring stages 3 and 4 as
NREM 3; and (4) too few rules for scoring arousals and REM sleep without atonia.
SUMMARY
Four years have passed since the AASM Scoring Manual was published with far less criticism than those who developed it feared.
The AASM Manual provides a foundation upon which we all can build rules and methods which identify the complexity of sleep
and its disorders.
Authors
Institution
University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC 10 5620, One University of NM, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA. MGriggD@salud.unm.edu
Source
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 8:3 2012 Jun 15 pg 323-32MeSH
AdolescentAdult
Age Factors
Child
Humans
Observer Variation
Polysomnography
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Sleep
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Sleep Disorders
Sleep Stages
Societies, Medical
United States
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleReview
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22701392
Log In

