Comparative evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide and mid-regional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide changes from admission to discharge in prognosis of acute decompensated heart failure patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Mid-regional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide (MRproANP) seems to be non-inferior compared to B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)
for heart failure diagnosis and prognosis; however, no previous studies have investigated the MRproANP in-hospital changes
in prognostic role. This study aimed to compare the prognostic accuracy of BNP and MRproANP in-hospital changes in acute decompensated
heart failure (ADHF) patients.
METHODS
37 patients with either admission/pre-discharge BNP and MRproANP data, were investigated. The combined endpoint was cardiovascular
death/heart transplantation/readmission for HF.
RESULTS
BNP and MRproANP had a median decrease of 55% [72;45] and 21% [40; 11] respectively in event-free patients; BNP decrease of
34% [48; 29] but MRproANP increase of 4% [-7; 25] in patients with cardiovascular events. Prognostic accuracy of deltaBNP
and deltaMRproANP was similar.
CONCLUSIONS
MRproANP basically trends up in patients with worse outcome and decreases in event-free patients, likely leading to a simpler
interpretation although the prognostic accuracy is similar for both peptides.
Authors
Stenner E, Buiatti A, Barbati G, Merlo M, Sinagra G, Biasioli B
Institution
Department of Laboratory Medicine, A.O.U, Ospedali Riuniti di Trieste, Trieste, Italy. elisabetta.stenner@libero.it
Source
Clinical laboratory 58:5-6 2012 pg 585-9MeSH
Acute DiseaseAged
Atrial Natriuretic Factor
Biological Markers
Female
Heart Failure
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
Patient Discharge
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
ROC Curve
Reproducibility of Results
Pub Type(s)
Comparative StudyJournal Article
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22783593
Log In

