Chemometric processing of pharmaceutical essential oil fingerprints -- comparison of GC, HPLC, TLC, IR spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry.
Abstract
Fifteen essential oils of pharmaceutical grade were fingerprinted by five techniques: TLC, GC, HPLC, attenuated total reflectance FTIR spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Denoising and baseline removal was found to be a crucial step for correct comparative analysis. Standardization of the signal was not necessary in the presented case; however, it should be considered and checked in each case. Due to small variance explained by first two principal components (below 50%) and outlying observations, the main analysis was performed by Euclidean dendrograms. It was found that almost all techniques besides DSC find real chemical similarities; however, DSC can be used as an additional tool. The similarities among the five techniques were also compared and discussed.
Links
Authors
Pietraś R, Skibiński R, Trebacz H, Gumieniczek A
Institution
Medical University of Lublin, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Lublin, Poland.
Source
Journal of AOAC International 95:3 pg 699-703MeSH
Calorimetry, Differential ScanningChromatography, Gas
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Chromatography, Thin Layer
Oils, Volatile
Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
Pub Type(s)
Comparative StudyJournal Article
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22816259
Log In

