Low fitness is associated with exercise abnormalities among asymptomatic firefighters.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has been repeatedly linked to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, while higher CRF
levels are protective. This relationship is likely to be highly relevant in firefighters, who have increased risk of cardiovascular
disease (CVD) mortality during strenuous emergencies, which can require prolonged periods of near-maximal heart rates (HR)
and high workloads. Abnormalities during maximal stress testing could mark future CVD risk during strenuous duties.
AIMS
To determine if low CRF among asymptomatic firefighters is associated with higher risk of electrocardiographic (ECG) and autonomic
abnormalities during maximal exercise stress testing and recovery.
METHODS
Male career firefighters completed a maximal stress test exercising to volitional exhaustion (mean maximal age-predicted HR
achieved 98%, standard deviation (SD) = 6.5). CRF was measured as maximal metabolic equivalents (METS) achieved. Abnormal
exercise tests included the following: abnormal HR recovery; chronotropic insufficiency; exaggerated blood pressure response;
and ECG abnormalities. The relationship of CRF to stress testing abnormalities was analysed using peak METS categories and
peak METS as a continuous variable after adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI) and metabolic syndrome (MetSyn).
RESULTS
There were 1149 study participants. CRF was inversely associated with the risk of both ECG and autonomic exercise testing
abnormalities before and after adjustment for age, BMI and MetSyn.
CONCLUSIONS
Firefighters with lower CRF are significantly more prone to exhibit abnormal stress test parameters, which may indicate higher
future risk of cardiovascular events. As such, firefighters with low CRF (≤ 12 METS) should receive cardiovascular risk reduction,
including efforts to improve their CRF.
Links
Authors
Baur DM, Leiba A, Christophi CA, Kales SN
Institution
The Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Employee Health and Industrial Medicine Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Source
Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) 62:7 2012 Oct pg 566-9Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22826554
Log In

