Unbound MEDLINE

Quality of life and functionality after lower limb amputations: comparison between uni- vs. bilateral amputee patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
It is difficult for the lower limb amputee patients to adapt to their new lifestyles.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the life quality and functionality of patients with bilateral vs. unilateral lower extremity amputations.
STUDY DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
METHODS
Fifteen bilateral and 15 unilateral lower extremity amputee patients were enrolled. Demographics, cause and level of amputations, frequency and duration of prosthesis use were evaluated. SF-36, Satisfaction with Prosthesis Questionnaire (SAT-PRO), Amputee Body Image Scale. (ABIS), Houghton Scale (HS), six-minute walk test (6MWT), and 10-metre walk test (10 MWT) were performed.
RESULTS
Physical function, physical and emotional role scores of SF-36 were significantly lower in the bilateral amputee group in comparison with the unilateral group. SAT-PRO and ABIS total scores were similar between the groups. There was a positive correlation between the frequency of prosthetic use and SF-36 subgroups (except pain). The unilateral amputee group had significantly better scores than the bilateral amputee group in terms of HS, 6MWT and 10 MWT.
CONCLUSION
Physical capacity of bilateral lower extremity amputee patients is lower than the unilateral amputee patients; satisfaction with prosthesis and body image are not related with the amputation level; and the life quality and satisfaction with prostheses are increased in parallel with the use of the prostheses. Clinical relevance Although differences exist between the groups, in terms of quality of life and functionality, patients can reach an acceptable life standard with good rehabilitation and a suitable prosthesis.

Links

  • Publisher Full Text
  • Authors

    Akarsu S, Tekin L, Safaz I, Göktepe AS, Yazicioğlu K

    Institution

    GMMA Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. selimakarsu@yahoo.com.tr

    Source

    Prosthetics and orthotics international 37:1 2013 Feb pg 9-13

    Pub Type(s)

    Journal Article

    Language

    eng

    PubMed ID

    22833517