Abstract
BACKGROUND
Up to 1% of adults will have a leg ulcer at some time. The majority of leg ulcers are venous in origin and are caused by high
pressure in the veins due to blockage or weakness of the valves in the veins of the leg. Prevention and treatment of venous
ulcers is aimed at reducing the pressure either by removing/repairing the veins, or by applying compression bandages/stockings
to reduce the pressure in the veins.The majority of venous ulcers heal with compression bandages, however ulcers frequently
recur. Clinical guidelines therefore recommend that people continue to wear compression, usually in the form of hosiery (tights,
stockings, socks) after their ulcer heals, to prevent recurrence.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of compression (socks, stockings, tights, bandages) in preventing the recurrence of venous ulcers. If
compression does prevent ulceration compared with no compression, then to identify whether there is evidence to recommend
particular levels of compression (high, medium or low, for example), types of compression, or brands of compression to prevent
ulcer recurrence after healing.
SEARCH METHODS
For this update we searched The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 1 March 2012); The Cochrane Central Register
of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to February Week 4 2012); Ovid MEDLINE
(In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, February 29, 2012); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2012 Week 08); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982
to 1 March 2012).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials evaluating compression bandages or hosiery for preventing the recurrence of venous ulcers.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors undertook data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently.
MAIN RESULTS
Four trials (979 participants) were eligible for inclusion in this review. One trial in patients with recently healed venous
ulcers (n = 153) compared recurrence rates with and without compression and found that compression significantly reduced ulcer
recurrence at six months (Risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.76).Two trials compared high-compression hosiery (equivalent
to UK class 3) with moderate-compression hosiery (equivalent to UK class 2). The first study (n=300) found no significant
reduction in recurrence at five years follow up with high-compression hosiery compared with moderate-compression (RR 0.82,
95% CI 0.61 to 1.12). The second study (n = 338) assessed ulcer recurrence at three years follow up and found that high-compression
hosiery reduced recurrence compared with moderate-compression (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.81). Statistically significant heterogeneity
precluded meta-analysis of the results from these studies. Patient-reported compliance rates were reported in both trials;,there
was significantly higher compliance with medium-compression than with high-compression hosiery in one and no significant difference
in the second.A fourth trial (166 patients) found no statistically significant difference in recurrence between two types
of medium (UK class 2) compression hosiery (Medi versus Scholl: RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.2).No trials of compression bandages
for preventing ulcer recurrence were identified.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is evidence from one trial that compression hosiery reduces rates of reulceration of venous ulcers compared with no
compression. Results from one trial suggest that recurrence is lower in high-compression hosiery than in medium-compression
hosiery at three years whilst another trial found no difference at 5 years. Rates of patient intolerance of compression hosiery
were high. There is insufficient evidence to aid selection of different types, brands, or lengths of compression hosiery.
Links
Authors
Institution
School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. e.a.nelson@leeds.ac.uk.
Source
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 8: 2012 pg CD002303MeSH
AdultCompression Bandages
Humans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recurrence
Risk
Stockings, Compression
Varicose Ulcer
Pub Type(s)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Language
eng
PubMed ID
22895929
Log In

