Abstract
AIMS
To compare Maori with nonMaori colorectal surgical admissions to a specialised colorectal unit in a teaching hospital.
METHODS
All patients admitted to the colorectal service of the university department of surgery, Wellington, New Zealand between April
1975 and March 1990 have been entered into a computerised data base. Patients claiming to be Maori or of Maori descent were
compared, in relation to colorectal diagnosis, type of admission and surgery and surgical complications, with those designated
European or other.
RESULTS
There were 90 Maori admissions (47 male, 43 female) and 1842 nonMaori admissions (1007 male, 835 female). The urgency of admission
was similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in admission rates for obstruction, perforation, bleeding,
diverticular disease, or anorectal abscess but more Maori seemed to have problems with haemorrhoids and perineal condylomata
acuminata. More nonMaori were admitted with colorectal cancer. The frequencies of most major operations were similar in the
two groups studied, although haemorrhoidectomy was more common in the Maori. A higher proportion of nonMaori patients had
a consultant surgeon as the primary operator. The overall complication rates, with the exception of urinary tract infections
were similar in both groups. One Maori patient died and there were 31 nonMaori deaths.
CONCLUSION
There was no evidence that Maori had either less access to the public hospital system or that surgical colorectal diseases
were more neglected. In general hospital admission rates for colorectal diseases in Maori and nonMaori were remarkably similar.
Authors
Institution
Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Source
The New Zealand medical journal 109:1034 1996 Nov 22 pg 442-4MeSH
AdultColonic Diseases
Databases, Factual
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
New Zealand
Polynesia
Rectal Diseases
Pub Type(s)
Comparative StudyJournal Article
Language
eng
PubMed ID
8982175
Log In

