The magnitude of the benefit from preCCU thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a long term follow up.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to determine the relationship among the time saved by administration of thrombolytic therapy in prehospital versus
hospital setting and long term mortality; number, duration of hospitalizations and their causes.
BACKGROUND
There is much theoretic, experimental and trial evidence to indicate that in acute myocardial infarction the earlier the thrombolytic
therapy is given, the greater its efficacy. However, the clinical importance of this gain time in long term is still uncertain.
SUBJECTS
280 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in perspective, controlled study with two parallel groups of consecutive
patients without contraindication for thrombolysis, who were seen by general emergency physicians before hospitalization (Gr.1)
or later in hospital by the attending cardiologist (Gr.2). The main outcomes measured was mortality rate at 5 years, causes,
number and duration of new hospitalizations.
RESULTS
The median pain to needle time was 90' (25 degrees percentile:67'; 75 degrees percentile:165') in Gr.1 vs 165' in Gr.2 (25
degrees percentile:110'; 75 degrees percentile:225'). The median time difference was 75' (P<0.001). The 35th day total mortality
rate was 7.5% and 10.6% (p:n.s.) in Gr.1 vs Gr.2 respectively, 8.6% (Gr.1) vs 19.7% (Gr.2) (P<0.015) at 1 year, and 19.2%
(Gr.1) vs 47.2% (Gr.2) (P<0.015) at 5 years. The percentage of patients with a number of new hospitalizations greater than
1 during 5 years was not significantly different in Gr.1 vs Gr.2 (44.1% vs 48.35, p:n.s.). The total duration of hospitalization
was 479 days in Gr.1 vs 1431 days in Gr.2 (P<0.001). The 75 Gr.1 patients alive at the end of 5 years follow up had a mean
hospital stay of 3.86+/-5.92 days vs 8.05+/-16.60 days (P<0.036) of the 94 Gr.2 patients alive after 5 years. The total and
mean stay for recurrence of acute MI was significantly different in Gr.1 vs Gr.2 (90 vs 425 days: P<0.001; and 13+/-6.2 days
vs 25+/-5.4: P<0.003 respectively). Cardiac failure led to the 1.16% in Gr.1 vs 9.43% of new admission (P<0.028) for a total
of 57 vs 243 days in Gr.1 and Gr.2 respectively (P<0.001). Cumulative mortality rate for any cause at 5 years was 19.2% and
47.2% in prehospital and in hospital treated patients (P<0.015), obtaining diverging survival curves.
CONCLUSIONS
The magnitude of the benefit from earlier thrombolysis is such that giving thrombolytic treatment earlier is the main problem
to reduce the time from onset of symptoms to reperfusion, to salvage myocardial muscle and obtain diverging survival curves.
Links
Authors
Coccolini S, Berti G, Maresta A
Institution
Department of Cardiology, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Source
International journal of cardiology 65 Suppl 1: 1998 May 29 pg S49-56MeSH
AnistreplaseEmergency Medical Services
Female
Fibrinolytic Agents
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Myocardial Infarction
Prospective Studies
Recurrence
Survival Analysis
Thrombolytic Therapy
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Pub Type(s)
Clinical TrialJournal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Language
eng
PubMed ID
9706827
Log In

