Tenecteplase (TNK) is a modified variant of alteplase (TPA) that offers advantages such as a long plasma half-life and high fibrin specificity. Previous studies have demonstrated the noninferiority of TNK to TPA in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although very elderly patients (aged ≥ 80 years) represent a significant proportion of AIS cases, research on the safety and efficacy of TNK in this population remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of TNK versus TPA in treating AIS in very elderly patients. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library up to May 20th, 2026. The outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-1 and 0-2 at 90 days, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), all-cause mortality, and parenchymal hematoma. We also performed subgroup analysis to assess the effects of patient race. We utilized mainly Review Manager 5.4 software to conduct the data synthesis and statistical analysis. Five RCTs (EXTEND-IA TNK, AcT, ATTEST-2, TRACE-2, and ORIGINAL) involving 1307 very elderly patients were included. Pooled analysis showed that TNK was associated with higher odds of excellent and good functional outcomes at 90 days compared with TPA (excellent: odds ratio (OR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-3.23, p = 0.03, I[2] = 75%; good: OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.06-1.71, p = 0.01, I[2] = 3%). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed that the association between TNK and excellent functional outcomes was no longer statistically significant after exclusion of the ORIGINAL trial (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.91-2.08, p = 0.13, I[2] = 52%). No statistically significant differences were observed between TNK and TPA in SICH (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.54-1.89, I[2] = 0%), 90-day mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.11, I[2] = 0%), or parenchymal hematoma (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.30-1.74, I[2] = 5%). In this pooled analysis of noninferiority-designed RCTs, TNK was associated with a trend toward improved functional outcomes compared with TPA in very elderly patients with AIS. However, the statistical significance of the excellent functional outcome was dependent on the inclusion of the ORIGINAL trial, and the association was no longer significant after its exclusion. This finding, combined with the high heterogeneity and small sample sizes, and the high risk of bias related to deviations from intended interventions in most included trials, suggests that the results should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. As all included trials were designed as noninferiority studies, adequately powered superiority trials are warranted to confirm the potential benefit of TNK over TPA in this population.Affiliation [1] has been split into two different affiliations. Please check if action taken is appropriate and amend if necessary.Thank you for checking. The splitting of Affiliation [1] into two separate affiliations is not appropriate. Although its institutional components are separated by semicolons, they collectively constitute one complete affiliation and should remain under a single affiliation number. The official English name has recently been updated. Please replace Affiliation [1] in its entirety with the following: "Neurology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Gerontology; National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology; The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China" Please also remove all Chinese text currently displayed in Affiliation [1]. We are unable to correct it directly because the editing window closes unexpectedly whenever we click on Affiliation [1] in the online proofing system. We confirm that the wording above is the correct and complete form of Affiliation [1]. Please retain it as a single affiliation and do not split it.Please check and confirm that the authors and their respective affiliations have been correctly identified and amend if necessary.We have checked the authors and their respective affiliations. Please note the following corrections: The former Affiliation [3], which has been marked for deletion in the proof, should be removed completely.Keying Zhang's previous affiliation did not include the name of her department. We have now added the department name to make her affiliation complete. Please retain the revised affiliation, including the newly added department information.After the deletion of the former Affiliation [3], the former Affiliation [4], which corresponds to Keying Zhang, should be renumbered as Affiliation [3]. Accordingly, Keying Zhang's affiliation number should also be changed from [4] to [3].We are unable to make this renumbering in the online proofing system. Please make the necessary corrections during production. The final affiliation list should contain only Affiliations [1], [2], and [3], with no Affiliation [4].