Although the use of beta blockers has measurably improved the state of cardiac care in the United States, more work remains to be done. Other meritorious interventions for cardiovascular conditions that deserve attention by MCO's. Given the continuing clinical and and cost burden of heart disease, MCO's can use the lessons learned from the success of beta blockers in other important areas of cardiovascular care, including longer-term beta-blocker therapy, treatment of lipid disorders, and use of aspirin and thienopyridine derivatives.

The mortality rate for coronary artery disease has decreased steadily over the past 25 yeas, attributable to a great extent to advances in medical and mechanical interventions. Nevertheless, mortality rates for acute coronary syndromes remain between 4% and 7%. This article highlights treatment options and the challenge of implementing evidence-based recommendations.

In 2002, Washington State Medicaid implemented a disease-management program for clients with diagnoses of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and diabetes. The program represented a unique attempt to manage disabled clients in a fee-for-services environment, and at its onset, was one of the first statewide programs in the United States. This article reviews the effectiveness of the program based on the results from two independent evaluations. Results of cost-savings measurements and health outcomes are presented for each of the conditions. These results were used to make program changes, which began in 2007.

More than 90 million Americans have trouble understanding basic health information. Patients with inadequate health literacy encounter problems when trying to understand information related to medication. Consequently, this population has a greater chance of not using pharmaceuticals properly, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Health care professionals, particularly pharmacists, should improve communication efforts with low-health literacy patients to achieve optimal results. This review examines the relationship between health literacy and medication use with the goals of helping the reader understand how to improve medication adherence and decrease adverse events from improper medication use.

The goal of this study was to quantify the incremental direct medical and indirect work-loss costs associated with patients diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD). A de-identified administrative claims database was used comprising 5.1 million covered beneficiaries from 31 Fortune 500 self-insured employers between 1998 and 2005. Patients with at least two AD diagnosis claims (N = 13,749) were compared with three matched controls (based on yr of birth and gender) with no AD diagnosis (N = 41,247). In addition, a multivariate two-part regression analysis was used to isolate the cost increase attributable to AD by controlling for confounding factors such as age, gender, health plan type, comorbidities, organ transplantation, industry of employer, region, and year. Direct medical and indirect work-loss costs for the AD group were higher on average by $88 and $64 per patient per month, respectively (both P< .001). After multivariate adjustment, the total incremental cost per patient per month for the AD group was $83 (direct: $52, P< .001; indirect: $31, P< .001). Employer-payers experience a significant annual cost burden of $991 per patient attributable to AD. Employee disability and increased sick days account for 38% of the cost burden.

A decision-analysis model was developed to evaluate health and economic effects of varenicline compared with other smoking-cessation aids for private health plans, Medicaid plans, or employee populations. Use of varenicline is projected to increase the number of successful smoking cessations after 10 years by approximately 14% compared with bupropion, 25% compared with nicotine patches, and 38% when compared with no pharmacologic aids. Varenicline use also results in immediate health care cost savings, compared with use of bupropion and savings within two years compared with nicotine patches or no aids. Comparing varenicline with no aids, the cost effectiveness of varenicline at two years ranged from $648 per additional cessation in the private health plan model to $836 per additional cessation in the Medicaid model. Employers often experience additional savings from decreased absenteeism and increased productivity, with combined savings in health care plus workplace costs associated with varenicline use of $165 to $457 per smoker over two years.

This study sought to determine the correlation between a health plan's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) score for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) control in patients with diabetes and its utilization of analog insulin, human insulin, and oral drug therapy as determined by the share of prescriptions of each therapy. Prescription volumes were tracked for four categories of diabetes drug therapy: (1) analog insulin, (2) human insulin, (3) single-source brand oral products, and (4) multisource generic oral products, for the three months ending January 2005 and January 2006 and matched to the 2004 and 2005 HEDIS scores. A correlation analysis conducted between the HbA1c-based HEDIS score and the prescription share of each drug category found a favorable and statistically significant (P < .0001) correlation between plan HbA1c HEDIS score and plan prescription share of analog insulin in both 2004 and 2005. The correlation between HEDIS scores and human insulin was not statistically significant. Unfavorable correlations were found between HEDIS scores and both the single-source brand and the multisource generic oral category prescription shares, although these correlations were found to be significant only for the single-source products in 2005.

The Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 offers prescription drug coverage through the Medicare part D program. However, the standard benefit does include a gap in coverage, commonly known as the "doughnut hole". This study, which included 90,615 subjects, aimed to evaluate the effect of the prescription drug coverage gap on drug utilization and expenditures. Beneficiaries in the study group were older (76.34 vs. 73.04 yr, P < .0001) and sicker (5.39 vs. 3.66 disease conditions, P < .0001) than those in the control group. They also incurred substantially higher out-of-pocket expenses ($2534 vs. $598, P < .0001) than the individuals in the control group. From the preperiod to the postperiod, the study group's average days of therapy decreased by 15.85% (from 1104 to 929, P < .0001), and total costs fell 28.02% (from $2441 to $1757, P < .0001). The average out-of-pocket costs increased by 88.94% (from $877 to $1657, P < .0001); in the control group, however, the average days of therapy increased by 1.77% (from 680 to 692), and total costs rose by 2.19% (from $1322 to $1351). Out-of-pocket costs decreased by 5.54% ($307 to $290). Using difference-indifference models, the Medicare part D prescription drug coverage gap was estimated to have reduced medication utilization by 187.49 days of therapy (P < .0001) while raising out-of-pocket costs by $796.49 (P < .0001) and increasing the generic utilization rate by 7.33% (P < .0001). Regular Medicare part D beneficiaries reduced medication utilization after they reached the coverage gap, which raises concerns those beneficiaries may face an increased risk of adverse health events.