Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This case evaluates the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized RCC in a patient with solitary functioning kidney. A retrospective chart review was conducted between September 2019 and January 2020 on a single patient. Before treatment, the tumor was 7 cm × 8 cm × 8.5 cm. The patient trialed nivolumab + ipilimumab then cabozantinib. The tumor shrunk to 6.3 cm × 5.5 cm and was removed via partial nephrectomy. This case demonstrates the efficacy of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of RCC. Expansion of guidelines could allow for patients with RCC to undergo partial nephrectomy.

With increasing treatment options available, the management of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is growing more complex, nuanced, and individualized. Strategies for combining surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) continue to evolve, as do ADT and immunotherapy options. Additionally, multiple adjunctive agents for metastatic PCa have been recently approved or are pending approval. As the number of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancers being diagnosed rises, so does the need to consider patients' clinical situations and personal preferences. This review discusses current and potential future approaches to managing locally advanced and metastatic PCa.

To compare prostate biopsy (Pbx) characteristics before and after the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate cancer (PCa) screening guidelines, we completed a retrospective comparative analysis of 1703 sequential patients that had a Pbx in 2010 to 2012 (3 years) with 383 patients biopsied in 2018 and 310 patients biopsied in 2019. Data was collected on patient age, race, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, digital rectal examination (DRE) results, total number of biopsies performed, and Gleason sum score (GSS). Data were analyzed to determine whether the 2012 USPSTF screening recommendations against PCa screening may have affected PCa characteristics. Three study groups were defined as Group A, Group B, and Group C. Group A represents Pbx prior to the 2012 USPSTF screening guidelines (2010-2012), Group B represents Pbx in 2018, and Group C represents Pbx in 2019. The patient population consisted of 73% Black men, 16% White men, and 11% men of other races. The number of patients that had a biopsy in Groups A through C, respectively, were 567 patients/year, 383 patients/year, and 310 patients/year. The annual positive Pbx rate for Group A through C was 134/year, 175/year, and 201/year, respectively. High-grade PCa (GSS 7-10) in Groups A through C was 51.5%, 60.5%, and 60.0%. The proportion of patients with a serum PSA level 10 ng/mL or greater in Groups A through C was 25.4%, 29.3%, and 33%. For patients age 70 to 80 years, there was an increasing trend for serum PSA levels 10 ng/mL and higher: 31%, 38%, and 39%, respectively. In this age group, high-grade tumors (GSS 7-10) occurred in 61%, 65%, and 68%, respectively. In 2019, Grade Group 3, 4, and 5 was present in 37.7% of 70- to 80-year-old men and 34.6% of Black men. More than 50% positive biopsy cores were present in 46.3% of 70- to 80-year old men and 36.6% of Black men. Our data through 2019 continued to show that after the 2012 USPSTF recommendations against PCa screening, PCa screening has decreased. We found decreased Pbx, increased PCa diagnosis, and increased high-grade PCa (GSS 7-10). As our patient population consisted of 73% Black patients and 33% of men age 70 to 80 years, our results support aggressive PCa screening for high-risk patients, which include Black men, men with a family history of PCa, and healthy men age 70 to 80 years.

We evaluated the impact of safety protocols, including rapid testing and contact tracing, on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk exposure and transmission rates amongst healthcare workers in the outpatient care setting. Over an 11-week period, a total of 254 employees representing 38% of our total workforce had potential COVID-19 exposure and underwent voluntary COVID-19 testing. Data was stratified based on severity of risk exposure and job description. During this period, the probability of a COVID exposure being high risk decreased in Administrative (-93.0%; P < 0.01) and Clinical (-77.0%; P < 0.01) staff; simultaneously, viral transmission rates declined in Administrative (-73.4%; P = 0.03) and Clinical (-69.9%; P = 0.04) staff as well. Systematic safety protocols effectively reduce exposure risk and transmission rates in outpatient healthcare workers and should be ubiquitously adopted.

Current guidelines regarding treatment for germ-cell tumors (GCTs) emphasizes cautious progression focusing on stage-specific treatments. Presented herein is the case of a 30-year-old man who, through monitoring of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and surveillance imaging, avoided excessive treatment. This case demonstrates how an experienced clinician, familiar with natural history of GCTs, can appropriately classify level of risk and allow a patient to preserve natural fertility. Furthermore, we highlight the potential for miRNA analysis in staging and management of GCTs. This case serves to underscore the importance of acting with caution in the pursuit of the best outcome for our patients.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a rare complication of prostate cancer. It is likely underdiagnosed as suggested by autopsy studies and is expected to become more prevalent with increasing survival of prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is associated with rapid functional decline and a median survival of approximately 1 month. Diagnosis is challenging because the clinical manifestations are varied, and no gold-standard diagnostic approach exists. Treatment of prostate cancer leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is not standardized and multiple approaches have been reported, mostly as case studies. Herein we report a case of a 73-year-old patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who presented to our clinic with subacute cognitive decline, ataxia, and urinary incontinence, and was found to have leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Call centers provide front-line care and service to patients. This study compared call-answering efficiency and costs between the implementation of an internal, centralized call center (January to July 2019) and previously outsourced call-center services (January to July 2018) for a large urology community practice. Retrospective review of call metrics and cost data was performed. Internal call-center leadership, training, and culture was examined through survey of staff and management. A total of 299,028 calls with an average of 5751 calls per week were answered during the study periods. The Average Speed of Answer (ASA) was 1:42 (min:s) for the outsourced call center and 0:14 for the internal call center (P < 0.001), with 70% of outsourced calls answered under 2 minutes compared with 99% of calls for the internal call center (P < 0.001). The Average Handle Time (AHT) for each outsourced call was 5:32 versus 3:41 for the internal call center (P < 0.001). The total operating expenses were 7.7% lower for the internal call center. Surveys revealed the importance of engaged leadership and staff training with feedback, simplified work algorithms, and expanded clinical roles. We found that internal, centralized call centers may provide a call-answering solution with greater efficiency and lower total operating expense versus an outsourced call center for large surgical practices. A culture that emphasizes continuous improvement and empowers call-center staff with expanded clinical roles may ultimately enhance patient communication and service.

Multiparametric MRI and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have emerged as tools to reveal suspicious prostate lesions and MRI-targeted biopsy has shown potential to avoid repeat prostate biopsies and miss fewer significant cancers. This retrospective study sought to assess the differences in diagnostic yield and sampling efficiency between MRI-targeted and standard biopsies in a community urology practice. We concluded that MRI-targeted biopsy was more efficient than a standard biopsy, although neither technique achieved a superior diagnostic yield of clinically significant cancer in our community setting. We recommend that a standard biopsy be performed alongside targeted biopsy.