(Surgical endoscopy.[TA])
19,261 results
  • Clinical significance of intraoperative dissection time and machine learning-based prediction in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. [Journal Article]
    Surg Endosc. 2026 Oct 16. [Online ahead of print]Wu A, Lai C, … Wang GSE
  • CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer, an intraoperative dissection time of 133 min was identified as a critical threshold, beyond which there was a higher incidence of complications. Although there were differences in prognosis, intraoperative dissection time was not an independent risk factor. Among the evaluated models, the random forest model showed the most stable predictive performance and may offer additional value for the preoperative evaluation of patients at risk of prolonged intraoperative dissection time.
  • Operating under pressure: a scoping review of the effects of climate change on general surgery. [Journal Article]
    Surg Endosc. 2026 Oct 16. [Online ahead of print]Woo KP, Alipouriani A, … SAGES and EAES Sustainability in Surgery CommitteeSE
  • CONCLUSIONS: High-level evidence regarding climate change's impact on general surgery remains limited. Emerging evidence suggests that extreme weather events and temperature fluctuations may increase demand for surgical services, disrupt timely access to treatment, and worsen postoperative outcomes. These effects may further strain healthcare systems and resources, requiring targeted mitigation and future research in this important evolving field.
  • Efficacy, safety, and cost of immediate versus on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Review]
    Surg Endosc. 2026 Oct 15. [Online ahead of print]Al Hayek M, Sawaf B, … Al-Haddad MSE
  • CONCLUSIONS: Immediate endoscopic necrosectomy did not demonstrate a consistent clinical advantage over an on-demand approach. Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests little or no difference in clinical efficacy or safety outcomes, while very-low-certainty evidence suggests that immediate necrosectomy may increase the proportion of patients undergoing necrosectomy. However, the magnitude and clinical significance of this effect remain uncertain. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of randomized trials, modest sample sizes, and low or very low certainty of evidence for several outcomes.