Unbound MEDLINE

Reconstruction of nasal defects larger than 1.5 centimeters in diameter. The Laryngoscope. [Laryngoscope] Journal article

 
TitleReconstruction of nasal defects larger than 1.5 centimeters in diameter.
Author(s)Park SS 
InstitutionDepartment of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville 22902-0713, USA.
SourceLaryngoscope 2000 Aug; 110(8):1241-50.
MeSHAdult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
Female
Forehead
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mohs Surgery
Nose Neoplasms
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Retrospective Studies
Skin Neoplasms
Surgical Flaps
Suture Techniques
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To review the repair of larger nasal defects (> 1.5 cm in diameter) and the vascular supply to the forehead flap.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review (1994-1999) and cadaver analysis of forehead flap vasculature.
METHODS: Chart review was made of patients with cutaneous nasal defects greater than 1.5 cm in diameter. An intravascular silicone cast was used to detail the arterial supply to forehead flaps focusing on contribution from the supratrochlear and angular vessels.
RESULTS: In 127 patients with nasal defects, 76 defects were greater than 1.5 cm in diameter and were repaired with a midline forehead flap (44 [58%]), paramedian forehead flap (3 [4%]), single-stage midline forehead flap (8 [11%]), interpolated melolabial flap (5 [7%]), local nasal flap (7 [9%]), or skin graft (9 [12%]). All original defects were modified to some degree with an aggressive application of the nasal esthetic subunit principle. Forty-three patients (57%) had cartilage grafts, 18 (24%) had a full-thickness defect requiring repair of the internal lining, and 11 (14%) had some degree of complication, although no patient had full-thickness necrosis of a flap or required a second flap. Analysis of the vascular pedicle to the midline and paramedian forehead flaps demonstrated significant contributions from the angular artery. Skin paddles from a midline and paramedian forehead flap had similar vascular arcades.
CONCLUSIONS: Nasal reconstruction has reached a standard of consistent esthetic results with restoration of nasal function. The midline forehead flap is dependable and robust and leaves a donor site scar consistent with the principle of esthetic units.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Case Reports
Journal Article
PubMed ID10942120
  
Advertise on this site.