| Title | Friend or foe? How primary care physicians perceive hospitalists. | | Author(s) | Fernandez A, Grumbach K, Goitein L, Vranizan K, Osmond DH, Bindman AB | | Institution | Primary Care Research Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. aliciaf@itsa.ucsf.edu. | | Source | Arch Intern Med 2000 Oct 23; 160(19):2902-8. | | MeSH | Attitude of Health Personnel
California
Family Practice
Female
Hospitalists
Humans
Internal Medicine
Interprofessional Relations
Male
Middle Aged
Pediatrics
Physicians, Family
Quality of Health Care
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
| | Abstract | BACKGROUND: Increased use of hospitalists is redefining the role of primary care physicians. Whether primary care physicians welcome this transition is unknown. We examined primary care physicians' perceptions of how hospitalists affect their practices, their patient relationships, and overall patient care.
METHODS: A mailed survey of randomly selected general internists, general pediatricians, and family practitioners with experience with hospitalists practicing in California.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physicians' self-reports of hospitalists' effects on quality of patient care and on their own practices.
RESULTS: Seven hundred eight physicians were eligible for this study, and there was a 74% response rate. Of the 524 physicians who responded, 34% were internists, 38% were family practitioners, and 29% were pediatricians. Of the 524 respondents, 335 (64%) had hospitalists available to them and 120 (23%) were required to use hospitalists for all admissions. Physicians perceived hospitalists as increasing (41%) or not changing (44%) the overall quality of care and perceived their practice style differences as neutral or beneficial. Twenty-eight percent of primary care physicians believed that the quality of the physician-patient relationship decreased; 69% reported that hospitalists did not affect their income; 53% believed that hospitalists decreased their workload; and 50% believed that hospitalists increased practice satisfaction. In a multivariate model predicting physician perceptions, internists, physicians who attributed loss of income to hospitalists, and physicians in mandatory hospitalist systems viewed hospitalists less favorably.
CONCLUSIONS: Practicing primary care physicians have generally favorable perceptions of hospitalists' effect on patients and on their own practice satisfaction, especially in voluntary hospitalist systems that decrease the workload of primary care physicians and do not threaten their income. Primary care physicians, particularly internists, are less accepting of mandatory hospitalist systems. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2902-2908 | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 11041896 |
|
