| Title | 'Light' and 'mild' cigarettes: who smokes them? Are they being misled? | | Author(s) | Ashley MJ, Cohen J, Ferrence R | | Institution | Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. maryjane.ashley@utoronto.ca | | Source | Can J Public Health 2001 Nov-Dec; 92(6):407-11. | | MeSH | Adult
Advertising
Comparative Study
Data Collection
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Nicotine
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Smoke
Smoking
Smoking Cessation
Tars
| | Abstract | Using two population-based surveys of Ontarians, we examined the proportions of smokers who smoke 'light' and 'mild' cigarettes (L/M). We compared L/M smokers to regular cigarette smokers regarding demographic, health knowledge, and smoking characteristics and examined their health-related perceptions of L/M and reasons for smoking them. Use of these cigarettes increased from 71% in 1996 to 83% in 2000. Those who smoked L/M were more likely to be female, to be less addicted, and to be more advanced toward quitting. In 1996, one in five believed that smoking L/M lowers the risk of cancer and heart disease. In 1996 and 2000, respectively, 44% and 27% smoked L/M to reduce health risks, 41% and 40% smoked them as a step toward quitting, and 41% in both years said they would be more likely to quit if they learned L/M could provide the same tar and nicotine as regular cigarettes. These data provide empirical support for banning 'light' and 'mild' on cigarette packaging. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 11799542 |
|
