Unbound MEDLINE

Ertapenem versus ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. [Antimicrob Agents Chemother] Journal article

 
TitleErtapenem versus ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.
Author(s)Tomera KM, Burdmann EA, Reyna OG, Jiang Q, Wimmer WM, Woods GL, Gesser RM, Protocol 014 Study Group 
InstitutionAlaska Clinical Research Center, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
SourceAntimicrob Agents Chemother 2002 Sep; 46(9):2895-900.
MeSHAdult
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary
Ceftriaxone
Cephalosporins
Comparative Study
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Lactams
Male
Prospective Studies
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Urinary Tract Infections
beta-Lactams
AbstractThe efficacy and safety of intravenous (i.v.) ertapenem (1 g once a day) with the option to switch to an oral agent for treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) were compared with that of i.v. ceftriaxone (1 g daily) with the same oral switch option in a multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized study. At entry, 592 patients were assigned to one of two strata: acute pyelonephritis or other complicated UTI without acute pyelonephritis. After a minimum of 3 days, patients could be switched to an oral antimicrobial agent. A total of 159 patients in the ertapenem group and 171 patients in the ceftriaxone group were microbiologically evaluable. Approximately 95% of patients in each treatment group were switched to oral therapy. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. At the primary efficacy endpoint 5 to 9 days after treatment, 91.8% of patients who received ertapenem and 93.0% of those who received ceftriaxone had a favorable microbiological response (95% confidence interval for the difference, adjusting for strata, -7.6 to 5.1%), indicating that outcomes in the two treatment groups were equivalent. Microbiological success rates for the two treatment groups were similar when compared by stratum and also by severity of infection. The frequency and severity of drug-related adverse events were generally similar in both treatment groups. In this study, ertapenem was as effective as ceftriaxone for the initial treatment of complicated UTIs in adults, was generally well tolerated, and had a similar overall safety profile.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed ID12183244
  
Advertise on this site.