| Title | Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach in medium-sized tumors. | | Author(s) | Mamikoglu B, Esquivel CR, Wiet RJ | | Institution | Division of Otolaryngology/Neurotology and Evanston Research Institute, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL, USA. | | Source | Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003 Apr; 129(4):429-31. | | MeSH | Adult
Aged
Audiometry
Comparative Study
Ear, Inner
Facial Nerve
Facial Nerve Diseases
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neuroma, Acoustic
Otologic Surgical Procedures
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Postoperative Complications
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
| | Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative facial nerve function results according to surgical approach.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review study.
SETTING: All surgical procedures were conducted in collaboration with a neurosurgery team in teaching hospitals with an academic affiliation.
PATIENTS: Patients with medium to large vestibular schwannomas, with the tumor size ranging from 2 to 3 cm. Ninety-eight patients were identified from an "Acoustic Neuroma Database" (date range of search, 1983-2000).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The House-Brackmann scale was used for grading facial function in the immediate postoperative period and 1 year after. Guidelines of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery were used for classification of hearing preservation.
RESULTS: Of the 98 patients, 17 were operated on through a retrosigmoid approach and 81 through the translabyrinthine route. The mean +/- SD ages of these 2 groups of patients were 46 +/- 13 and 51 +/- 14 years, respectively; mean +/- SD tumor sizes were 2.5 +/- 0.27 and 2.6 +/- 0.28 cm, respectively. One year after tumor removal via retrosigmoid approach, 10 (59%) of the 17 patients had good (grade I-II) facial functions and 2 (12%) had poor (grade V-VI) function. In the translabyrinthine group, 54 (68%) of 79 patients (2 patients had subtotal total tumor removal) had good facial nerve function at the end of the 1-year follow-up, and 13 (17%) continued to have poor facial function. The difference between these groups was not statistically significant (P>.05). Hearing was preserved in 4 (24%) of the 17 patients in the retrosigmoid group.
CONCLUSION: Although the translabyrinthine approach may offer better long-term facial function compared with the retrosigmoid approach in patients with medium-sized tumors, the difference between these 2 groups was not significant enough to favor one approach over the other. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 12707190 |
|
