Unbound MEDLINE

Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. [J Am Acad Dermatol] Journal article

 
TitleDermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet.
Author(s)Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, Binder M, Cerroni L, De Rosa G, Ferrara G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Landthaler M, Menzies SW, Pehamberger H, Piccolo D, Rabinovitz HS, Schiffner R, Staibano S, Stolz W, Bartenjev I, Blum A, Braun R, Cabo H, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Fleming MG, Grichnik JM, Grin CM, Halpern AC, Johr R, Katz B, Kenet RO, Kittler H, Kreusch J, Malvehy J, Mazzocchetti G, Oliviero M, Ozdemir F, Peris K, Perotti R, Perusquia A, Pizzichetta MA, Puig S, Rao B, Rubegni P, Saida T, Scalvenzi M, Seidenari S, Stanganelli I, Tanaka M, Westerhoff K, Wolf IH, Braun-Falco O, Kerl H, Nishikawa T, Wolff K, Kopf AW 
InstitutionDepartment of Dermatology, Second University of Naples, Italy.
SourceJ Am Acad Dermatol 2003 May; 48(5):679-93.
MeSHAlgorithms
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
Diagnosis, Differential
Humans
Internet
Melanoma
Microscopy
Photography
Practice Guidelines
Reference Values
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin Diseases
Skin Neoplasms
Skin Pigmentation
Terminology
AbstractBACKGROUND: There is a need for better standardization of the dermoscopic terminology in assessing pigmented skin lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The virtual Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy was organized to investigate reproducibility and validity of the various features and diagnostic algorithms.
METHODS: Dermoscopic images of 108 lesions were evaluated via the Internet by 40 experienced dermoscopists using a 2-step diagnostic procedure. The first-step algorithm distinguished melanocytic versus nonmelanocytic lesions. The second step in the diagnostic procedure used 4 algorithms (pattern analysis, ABCD rule, Menzies method, and 7-point checklist) to distinguish melanoma versus benign melanocytic lesions. kappa Values, log odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratios were estimated for all diagnostic algorithms and dermoscopic features.
RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was fair to good for all diagnostic methods, but it was poor for the majority of dermoscopic criteria. Intraobserver agreement was good to excellent for all algorithms and features considered. Pattern analysis allowed the best diagnostic performance (positive likelihood ratio: 5.1), whereas alternative algorithms revealed comparable sensitivity but less specificity. Interobserver agreement on management decisions made by dermoscopy was fairly good (mean kappa value: 0.53).
CONCLUSION: The virtual Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy represents a valid tool for better standardization of the dermoscopic terminology and, moreover, opens up a new territory for diagnosing and managing pigmented skin lesions.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Consensus Development Conference
Journal Article
Review
PubMed ID12734496
  
Advertise on this site.