Unbound MEDLINE

Comparative bioequivalence study of two isotretinoin soft gel capsule formulations in healthy male volunteers. International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. [Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther] Journal article

 
TitleComparative bioequivalence study of two isotretinoin soft gel capsule formulations in healthy male volunteers.
Author(s)Georgarakis M, Zougrou F, Tzavara S, Kontopoulos G, Tsiptsios I 
InstitutionLaboratory of Pharmaceutics and Drug Control, Department of Pharmacy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. mgeorgara@hotmail.com
SourceInt J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003 Jul; 41(7):316-22.
MeSHAdult
Analysis of Variance
Area Under Curve
Capsules
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Comparative Study
Cross-Over Studies
Dermatologic Agents
Gels
Half-Life
Humans
Isotretinoin
Male
Therapeutic Equivalency
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of 2 oral isotretinoin (20 mg) soft gel capsule formulations. The reference preparation was Roaccutan/Roche while the test preparation was A-Cnotren/Pharmaten, Athens, Greece. SUBJECTS,
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was an open, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, 2-treatment crossover, involving 38 healthy male volunteer subjects. All volunteers completed the study. Isotretinoin plasma concentrations were measured by a fully validated HPLC method. Special care was taken through the collection and analysis of the samples due to instability of isotretinoin to light and temperature. Pharmacokinetic parameters used to assess bioequivalence were AUC(0-last), AUC(0-infinity) for the extent of absorption and Cmax and Tmax for the rate of absorption. Statistical evaluation of Cmax, AUC(0-last), AUC(0-infinity) was done after semi-logarithmic transformation by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tmax values were tested using the distribution-free Hodges-Lehman interval.
RESULTS: The parametric 90% confidence intervals for ratio T/R ranged from 95.20-103.20% (point estimate 99.10%) for AUC(0-last), 94.57-102.30% (point estimate 98.36%) for AUC(0-infinity) and 94.81-102.90% (point estimate 98.77%) for Cmax, respectively. Based on the results of Tmax, k(el) and t(1/2), too, there were no statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSION: As a result, the 2 isotretinoin preparations in accordance with the European Union bioequivalence requirements, are equivalent with respect to rate and extent of absorption.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed ID12875348
  
Advertise on this site.