| Title | Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. | | Author(s) | Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, Emery R, Magee MJ, Connolly M, Subramanian V | | Institution | Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute, Medical City Dallas Hospital, TX, USA. mjmack@earthlink.net | | Source | J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004 Jan; 127(1):167-73. | | MeSH | Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Cohort Studies
Comparative Study
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Disease
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Postoperative Complications
Predictive Value of Tests
Probability
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
| | Abstract | BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting can now be performed with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Our objective was to determine whether off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with better early outcomes compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.
METHODS: In 4 centers with off-pump coronary surgery experience, a retrospective analysis of all coronary artery bypass grafting in a 3-year period was performed. Groups were compared to determine selection criteria, mortality, and morbidity, then computer-matched by propensity score to control for selection bias. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors predictive of mortality. Specific subgroups most likely to benefit were identified.
RESULTS: In all, 17,401 isolated coronary artery bypass grafts were performed, 7283 (41.9%) off-pump coronary artery bypass grafts and 10,118 (58.1%) conventional coronary artery bypass with cardiopulmonary bypass. Factors determining selection of patients for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting included female gender (55.5% vs 44.5%), preexisting renal failure (57.0% vs 43.0%), and reoperations (52.6% vs 47.4%). Operative mortality was 2.8%; off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus conventional coronary artery bypass with cardiopulmonary bypass (1.9% vs 3.5%, P <.001) had the same predicted risk. Of the patients with multivessel disease, 11,548 were matched by propensity scoring. Mortality was significantly less in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (2.8% vs 3.7%, P <.001). By multivariate logistic regression analysis of the matched sample, predictors for mortality were female gender (odds ratio 1.83, confidence interval 1.37-2.44), preexisting renal failure (odds ratio 2.85, confidence interval 2.64-4.95), history of stroke (odds ratio 1.74, confidence interval 1.08-2.80), previous coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (odds ratio 4.22, confidence interval 2.92-6.09), use of cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio 2.08, confidence interval 1.52-2.83), and recent myocardial infarction (odds ratio 2.31, confidence interval 1.68-3.22). Cardiopulmonary bypass was predictive of mortality in reoperations, female patients, and patients aged >or= 75 years. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with less morbidity, including reductions in blood transfusion (32.6% vs 40.6%, P <.001), stroke (1.4% vs 2.1%, P =.002), renal failure (2.6% vs 5.2%, P <.001), pulmonary complications (4.1% vs 9.5%, P <.001), reoperation (1.7% vs 3.2%, P <.001), atrial fibrillation (21.1% vs 24.99%, P <.001), and gastrointestinal complications (3.6% vs 4.8%, P =.02).
CONCLUSION: In 4 centers with beating-heart operation experience, there is an overall early benefit in off-pump surgery, especially in patients traditionally considered at high risk for coronary artery bypass grafting. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
Multicenter Study
| | PubMed ID | 14752427 |
|
