| Title | Validation of the anthrax lethal toxin neutralization assay. | | Author(s) | Hering D, Thompson W, Hewetson J, Little S, Norris S, Pace-Templeton J | | Institution | Product Development and Regulatory Affairs, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5011, USA. Donna.Hering@det.amedd.army.mil | | Source | Biologicals 2004 Mar; 32(1):17-27. | | MeSH | Animals
Anthrax Vaccines
Antigens, Bacterial
Bacillus anthracis
Bacterial Toxins
Cell Division
Cell Line
Humans
Immunoassay
In Vitro
Mice
Neutralization Tests
Rabbits
Reproducibility of Results
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Sensitivity and Specificity
Temperature
Tetrazolium Salts
Thiazoles
Time Factors
| | Abstract | A validation of the performance characteristics of a toxin neutralization assay is presented. This in vitro assay measures the functional ability of antisera, containing antibodies to anthrax lethal toxin, to specifically protect J774A.1 cells against Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin cytotoxicity. This colormetric assay is based upon the reduction of MTT by living cells. Human and rabbit antisera produced against anthrax vaccine absorbed (AVA) were used to validate the assay. Results showed a high level of repeatability and reproducibility, particularly for a bio-assay. Inter-assay variability in absorbance values was the most prominent negative finding however, an acceptable level was demonstrated with a ratio [neutralization ratio (NR)] of the test serum 50% effective dose (ED(50)) to the reference standard ED(50). Accuracy was maintained, even in samples with minimal neutralizing capacity, and linearity was noted when sample dilutions resulted in accurate prediction of the Y(max)and Y(min). Specificity tests demonstrated that normal sera did not have an observable effect on the ability of the reference standard to neutralize toxin. The assay remained stable against time, temperature, and freeze/thaw effects on the reference standards, but not on the toxin. The assay also remained stable against media and solution storage effects. Cell passage number and cell plating density were two critical parameters identified during the robustness studies that may be responsible for inter-assay variability in absorbance values. The work was performed in accordance with the FDA's Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry and the FDA's Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (21 CFR Part 58). | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 15026022 |
|
