Unbound MEDLINE

Tissue Doppler imaging does not show infraclinical alteration of myocardial function after contrast echocardiography. European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology. [Eur J Echocardiogr] Journal article

 
TitleTissue Doppler imaging does not show infraclinical alteration of myocardial function after contrast echocardiography.
Author(s)Cosyns B, Weytjens C, Vanderhoogstrate M, Daniels C, Schoors D, Van Camp G 
InstitutionCardiology Department, Academisch Ziekenhuis--VUB, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. bcosyns@skynet.be
SourceEur J Echocardiogr 2005 Aug; 6(4):238-42.
MeSHAdult
Cardiomyopathies
Contrast Media
Echocardiography
Echocardiography, Doppler
Female
Humans
Male
Microbubbles
Middle Aged
Phospholipids
Prospective Studies
Safety
Sulfur Hexafluoride
Ventricular Function, Left
AbstractBACKGROUND: It has been previously suggested that simultaneous exposure of hearts to contrast and ultrasound can damage the myocardium and produce a transient decrease of the contractility in animals. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is a useful tool to quantify the myocardial function with very high temporal resolution. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to test whether contrast echocardiography (CE) can cause alteration of the myocardial function by using tissue Doppler analysis.
METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy patients (mean age: 44 +/- 22) underwent baseline echocardiography before and after 5 min of continuous intravenous infusion of Sonovue from the apical views, using an intermediate mechanical index (MI = 1). High frame rate images were acquired in tissue Doppler mode. Data were averaged over 3 cardiac cycles and analysed off-line before and after CE.
RESULTS: There were no significant changes, before and after CE, in the peak systolic velocity (basal septum (BS): 6.2 +/- 2.2 vs 6.4 +/- 2.6; basal lateral (BL): 6.2 +/- 3.1 vs 6.4 +/- 3.3 cm/s), in the peak diastolic E velocity (BS: 5.4+/-1.8 vs 5.3+/-1.7; BL: 7.3+/-2.4 vs 7.7 +/- 3.2 cm/s), in the peak diastolic A velocity (BS: 6.3 +/- 1.9 vs 6.9 +/- 2.4; BL: 6.1 +/- 3.5 vs 6.2 +/- 2.5 cm/s), in the peak systolic strain (BS: 16 +/- 7 vs 17 +/- 7; BL: 12.6 +/- 5 vs 12.9 +/- 5%) and in peak systolic strain rate (BS: 1.3+/-0.6 vs 1.4+/-0.6; BL: 1.2+/-0.5 vs 1.21+/-0.51 1/sec).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that CE does not cause alterations in the myocardial function as assessed by tissue Doppler imaging. CE, even with high MI settings, usually used for left ventricular opacification, can be safely performed.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Journal Article
PubMed ID15899594
  
Advertise on this site.