Unbound MEDLINE

Single-layer versus double-layer closure of facial lacerations: a randomized controlled trial. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. [Plast Reconstr Surg] Journal article

 
TitleSingle-layer versus double-layer closure of facial lacerations: a randomized controlled trial.
Author(s)Singer AJ, Gulla J, Hein M, Marchini S, Chale S, Arora BP 
InstitutionDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. adam.singer@stonybrook.edu
SourcePlast Reconstr Surg 2005 Aug; 116(2):363-8; discussion 369-70.
MeSHAdolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Comparative Study
Facial Injuries
Female
Humans
Infant
Lacerations
Male
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Surgical Wound Dehiscence
Suture Techniques
AbstractBACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the cosmetic outcome of facial lacerations closed with a single or double layer of sutures.
METHODS: Patients aged 1 year or older presenting to a university-based emergency department with nongaping (width, < 10 mm), simple, nonbite, facial lacerations were randomized to closure with a single layer of simple interrupted 6-0 polypropylene sutures or a double layer of simple interrupted 6-0 polypropylene plus inverted deep dermal 5-0 polyglactin sutures. At 90 days, the scar width and cosmetic appearance were determined using a validated 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) and a validated wound evaluation score ranging from 0 (worst) to 6 (best).
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were randomized to single-layer (n = 32) or double-layer (n = 33) closure. Mean age (SD) was 18.5 years (20.0), and 14 percent were female. Groups were similar in baseline patient and wound characteristics. Length of single-layer closure was 7 minutes shorter (95 percent CI, 2 to 11 minutes) than double-layer closure. There were no infections or dehiscences in either group. There were no between-group differences in patient (mean difference, 0.5 mm; 95 percent CI, -5.7 to 6.6 mm) or practitioner (mean difference, 1.0 mm; 95 percent CI, -4.8 to 6.7 mm) visual analogue scale scores. All but one patient had an optimal wound evaluation score of 6 (p = not significant). Scar width was similar at 90 days (mean difference, 0.2 mm; 95 percent CI, -0.05 to 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-layer closure of nongaping, minor (< 3 cm) facial lacerations is faster than double-layer closure. Cosmetic outcome and scar width are similar in sutured wounds whether or not deep dermal sutures are used.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed ID16079656
  
Advertise on this site.