| Title | Consensus recommendations for soft-tissue augmentation with nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid (Restylane). | | Author(s) | Matarasso SL, Carruthers JD, Jewell ML, Restylane Consensus Group | | Institution | Department of Dermatology, University of California, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94102, USA. slm_md@msn.com | | Source | Plast Reconstr Surg 2006 Mar; 117(3 Suppl):3S-34S; discussion 35S-43S. | | MeSH | Cosmetic Techniques
Humans
Hyaluronic Acid
Skin Aging
| | Abstract | The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery recently reported that there were nearly 12 million cosmetic procedures (2.1 million surgical and 9.7 million nonsurgical) performed in the United States in 2004. Almost 900,000 of the nonsurgical procedures were soft-tissue augmentation procedures using hyaluronic acid fillers. Restylane (Medicis Aesthetics, Inc., Scottsdale, Ariz.), nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid, was approved for use in the United States in December of 2003. Although the use of all fillers increased from 2003 to 2004, use of hyaluronic acid fillers increased nearly 700 percent. The dramatic increase in all cosmetic procedures reflects the growing trend, especially with increasing job competition, to maintain a youthful lifestyle and appearance. Basic recommendations for aesthetic use of Restylane were established based on short- and long-term efficacy and safety studies (Medicis Aesthetics, package insert). With the widespread and growing use of Restylane, a cross-sectional panel of experts with extensive clinical experience, including cosmetic dermatologists and surgical specialists (cosmetic, plastic, and ocular), convened to develop consensus guidelines for the use of Restylane. This supplement reviews the aesthetic affects of aging on the face, the role of fillers in facial soft-tissue volume replacement, and general principles for the use of Restylane, including patient comfort and assessment techniques. Specific recommendations for Restylane use in each potential target area, including type of anesthesia, injection techniques, volume for injection, use in combination with other procedures, and expected longevity of corrections, are provided. Techniques for optimizing patient outcomes and satisfaction and for minimizing and managing expected problems and potential complications are described. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Consensus Development Conference
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
| | PubMed ID | 16531934 |
|
