Unbound MEDLINE

Achieving LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B target levels in high-risk patients: Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin therapY (MERCURY) II. American heart journal. [Am Heart J] Journal article

 
TitleAchieving LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B target levels in high-risk patients: Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin therapY (MERCURY) II.
Author(s)Ballantyne CM, Bertolami M, Hernandez Garcia HR, Nul D, Stein EA, Theroux P, Weiss R, Cain VA, Raichlen JS 
InstitutionMethodist DeBakey Heart Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. cmb@bcm.tmc.edu
SourceAm Heart J 2006 May; 151(5):975.e1-9.
MeSHAged
Apolipoproteins B
Cholesterol
Coronary Disease
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Fluorobenzenes
Heptanoic Acids
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Lipoproteins, LDL Cholesterol
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrimidines
Pyrroles
Risk Factors
Simvastatin
Sulfonamides
Treatment Outcome
AbstractBACKGROUND: National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines for patients at a high risk of coronary heart disease set a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of < 100 mg/dL. This target can be difficult to attain with diet and current therapy.
METHODS: In a 16-week multinational trial, 1993 high-risk patients were randomized to rosuvastatin 20 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or simvastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks. Patients either remained on starting treatment or switched to lower or milligram-equivalent doses of rosuvastatin for 8 more weeks.
RESULTS: At 16 weeks, more patients achieved their LDL-C target by switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg than staying on atorvastatin 10 mg (66% vs 42%, P < .001) or simvastatin 20 mg (73% vs 32%, P < .001). Changing to rosuvastatin 20 mg brought more patients to their LDL-C target than staying on atorvastatin 20 mg (79% vs 64%, P < .001) or simvastatin 40 mg (84% vs 56%, P < .001). More very high risk patients achieved an LDL-C target of < 70 mg/dL when changed to rosuvastatin from atorvastatin or simvastatin (within-arm comparisons P < .01). More hypertriglyceridemic patients (triglycerides > or = 200 mg/dL) met LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B targets by changing to rosuvastatin. Switching to rosuvastatin produced greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and lipid ratios. All treatments were well tolerated, with no differences among treatment groups in skeletal muscle, hepatic, or renal toxicity.
CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg is an effective and safe therapeutic option for high-risk patients to achieve their lipid and apolipoprotein targets.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed ID16644314
  
Advertise on this site.