Kłopocka M, Budzyński J, Swiątkowski M, Pulkowski G, Meder A Differences in esophageal corpus motility in patients with pathological and non-pathological gastroesophageal reflux. [JOURNAL ARTICLE] Med Sci Monit 2006 Aug 25; 12(9):CR387-392.
Background: First- and second-order esophageal contractions are important factors responsible for esophageal clearance of refluxed gastric content. The aim of this study was to estimate the influence of acid reflux on second-order esophageal peristalsis. Material/ Methods: Simultaneous 24-h esophageal pH-metry and 24-h motility monitoring was performed in 213 patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Pathological gastroesophageal acid reflux (pGER) was defined as pH<4 for more than 4.5% of the total monitoring time. Results: The group of pGER patients (n=65, 31%) had a lower percentage of complete and effective peristalsis, a higher percentage of incomplete peristalsis, and a lower mean contraction amplitude than the group of patients with normal esophageal acid exposure (nGER). Analysis of motility parameters in three periods, i.e. during acid reflux and 2 min before and 10 min after episodes (second-order peristalsis), showed that the pGER group had a lower percentage of effective peristalsis (20.6+/-13.3 vs. 29.6+/-16.2%, p=0.002) and a higher percentage of ineffective peristalsis both during and after acid reflux, a lower mean contraction amplitude (56.5+/-30.3 vs. 70.0+/-32.8 mmHg, p=0.025), and a lower contraction frequency during acid reflux (1.6+/-0.7 vs. 2.6+/-3.1/min, p=0.001) and 10 min after (1.9+/-1.9 vs. 20.6+/-30.2/min, p=0.002), which indicated a lack of esophageal peristalsis acceleration after acid reflux in the pGER group. Conclusions: 1) pGER patients had ineffective esophageal peristalsis more frequently than nGER patients. 2) Impaired second-order peristalsis in pGER patients may be an important factor determining prolonged exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastric content in addition to lower esophageal sphincter function.
More from this journal |