| Title | Breast-conserving therapy for centrally located breast cancer. | | Author(s) | Fitzal F, Mittlboeck M, Trischler H, Krois W, Nehrer G, Deutinger M, Jakesz R, Gnant M | | Institution | Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. florian.fitzal@meduniwien.ac.at | | Source | Ann Surg 2008 Mar; 247(3):470-6. | | MeSH | Breast Neoplasms
Esthetics
Female
Humans
Mastectomy, Segmental
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
| | Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether breast-conserving therapy (BCT) may be an oncologically safe approach and result in a good cosmesis in patients with centrally located breast cancer (CLBC).
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Only underpowered, retrospective, single-arm studies have suggested that oncoplastic BCT for CLBC may be oncologically safe and may result in a good cosmesis.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed the overall and recurrence-free survival in 1485 patients with breast cancer undergoing BCT comparing CLBC with non-CLBC. Moreover, the authors described 4 different oncoplastic techniques for BCT in patients with CLBC and compared the cosmetic results with simple lumpectomy according to a recently elaborated objective cosmetic evaluation system, the Breast Symmetry Index.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curves show no significant difference in a 5-year overall, local, or distant recurrence-free survival between patients with CLBC and non-CLBC after BCT (94% vs. 96%; 100% vs. 98%; 92% vs. 90%; median follow-up, 35.3 months). The cosmetic outcome after oncoplastic BCT compared with simple lumpectomy differed significantly (Breast Symmetry Index: 22 +/- 6%d vs. 44 +/- 12%d; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that BCT for CLBC is oncologically safe and that oncoplastic techniques improve cosmesis. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
| | PubMed ID | 18376192 |
|
