Unbound MEDLINE

Zygomatic fractures managed by closed reduction: an analysis with postoperative computed tomography follow-up evaluating the degree of reduction and remaining dislocation. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons [J Oral Maxillofac Surg] Journal article

 
TitleZygomatic fractures managed by closed reduction: an analysis with postoperative computed tomography follow-up evaluating the degree of reduction and remaining dislocation.
Author(s)af Geijerstam B, Hultman G, Bergström J, Stjärne P 
InstitutionDepartment of Clinical Science, Division of Ear, Nose, and Throat Diseases, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. birgitta.afgeijerstam@karolinska.se
SourceJ Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008 Nov; 66(11):2302-7.
MeSHAdolescent
Adult
Aged
Dislocations
Facial Asymmetry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation
Fractures, Malunited
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Questionnaires
Retrospective Studies
Somatosensory Disorders
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Zygomatic Fractures
AbstractPURPOSE: To evaluate possible associations between the degree of reduction, remaining dislocation (mm), fracture type, and the sequelae from which the patient may suffer postoperatively in patients with zygomaticomaxillary fracture managed by closed reduction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 3-year retrospective audit was undertaken to identify all patients who had sustained a fractured zygoma and were operated on by closed reduction at the Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden. Patients were followed up by mail questionnaire and postoperative computed tomography (CT).
RESULTS: The odds of having symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 4.26, confidence interval [CI] 1.09-18.44) was significantly higher in the group with a reduction less than 100% (n = 34) compared with the group with 100% reduction (n = 17) (P = .035). The odds of having symptoms (OR 9.91, CI 0.89->500) was higher in the group with remaining dislocation 6 to 10 mm compared with the group with no remaining dislocation (P = .069). The type of fracture (A, B, or C) also influenced the patients' postoperative symptoms. The odds of having symptoms was 48.40 (CI 4.60->500) times higher having fracture C compared with fracture A (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of reduction and remaining dislocation of zygomaticomaxillary fractures is important to achieve a good postoperative result, that is, reducing the patient's postoperative symptoms. Furthermore, the type of fracture also influences the patient's long-term sequelae.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Journal Article
PubMed ID18940496
  
Advertise on this site.