Effectiveness and safety of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz versus zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz for the initial treatment of HIV-infected patients from the Spanish VACH cohort. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy [J Antimicrob Chemother] Journal article | | Title | Effectiveness and safety of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz versus zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz for the initial treatment of HIV-infected patients from the Spanish VACH cohort. | | Author(s) | Crespo M, Ribera E, Suárez-Lozano I, Domingo P, Pedrol E, López-Aldeguer J, Muñoz A, Viladés C, Sánchez T, Viciana P, Teira R, García-Alcalde ML, Vergara A, Lozano F, Galindo MJ, Cosin J, Roca B, Terrón A, Geijo P, Vidal F, Garrido M, on behalf of the VACH Cohort Study Group | | Institution | Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. | | Source | J Antimicrob Chemother 2008 Nov 6. | | Abstract | Background Preliminary data suggest that a once-daily combination of lamivudine, didanosine and efavirenz is an effective alternative regimen for antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. However, data from randomized trials comparing this combination versus standard first-line regimens are not available yet. In an observational study, we analyse the efficacy and tolerability of didanosine plus lamivudine and efavirenz versus zidovudine plus lamivudine and efavirenz in a cohort of therapy naive patients. Methods We performed an observational study on prospectively collected data from patients participating in a multicentre Spanish treatment-naive cohort (VACH cohort). Efficacy was assessed comparing time to therapeutic failure and CD4 cell recovery. Safety was analysed comparing the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy for toxicity or any other reason. Results Overall, 219 patients treated with once-daily didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz and 409 patients receiving twice-daily zidovudine/lamivudine (Combivir((R))) plus efavirenz were evaluated. By intent-to treat analysis (non-completers and therapeutic change = failure), time to treatment failure was similar in both groups of treatment: 40.0 months (95% CI 23.3-56.8 months) among patients on didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz and 33.3 months (95% CI 25.6-41.1 months) in patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz (P = 0.253). The risk of failure due to treatment change was almost double among patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz compared with those who received didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz. Conclusions Our data suggest that didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz is a combination with an efficacy comparable to zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz as first-line therapy for HIV infection. The risk of treatment change was significantly higher among patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz than in those starting therapy with didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz. | | Language | ENG | | Pub Type(s) | JOURNAL ARTICLE
| | PubMed ID | 18988678 |
|
|
| |
Advertise on this site.
| | |
|
