Unbound MEDLINE

Comparison of the effects of low-dose vs. high-dose aminophylline on lung function in experimental meconium aspiration syndrome. Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society [J Physiol Pharmacol] Journal article

 
TitleComparison of the effects of low-dose vs. high-dose aminophylline on lung function in experimental meconium aspiration syndrome.
Author(s)Mokra D, Drgova A, Mokry J, Pullmann R, Redfors B, Petraskova M, Calkovska A 
InstitutionDepartment of Physiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovakia. mokra@jfmed.uniba.sk
SourceJ Physiol Pharmacol 2008 Dec.:449-59.
AbstractDue to missing information on appropriate dosing of aminophylline in meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), this study compared effects of high-dose and low-dose aminophylline on lung function of animals with MAS. Meconium-instilled rabbits were treated by low-dose (LD, 1.0 mg/kg), or high-dose (HD, 2.0 mg/kg) aminophylline at 0.5 and 2.5 h after meconium instillation, or were left untreated. Within 5 h of oxygen ventilation, HD-aminophylline improved gas exchange, reduced pulmonary shunts and ventilatory pressures, and decreased edema formation and lung neutrophils. LD-aminophylline enhanced lung function to a lower extent than HD-aminophylline, and failed to reduce lung edema and the number of lung neutrophils. Both treatments decreased lung peroxidation, with a stronger effect of HD-aminophylline on lipid oxidation and of LD-aminophylline on protein oxidation. Tracheal reactivity to histamine decreased after HD-aminophylline, while lung tissue reactivity was more reduced after LD-aminophylline. Although LD-aminophylline showed some anti-inflammatory potential, HD-aminophylline improved most of the parameters more effectively.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed ID19218669
  
Advertise on this site.