Unbound MEDLINE

Efficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination vs its components in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology : official organ of the International Association of Asthmology (INTERASMA) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Alergia e Inmunología [J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol] Journal article

 
TitleEfficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination vs its components in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Author(s)Grubbe RE, Lumry WR, Anolik R 
InstitutionCenter of Research Excellence, LLC, Oxford, Alabama, USA. robertgrubbe@coretrials.com
SourceJ Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2009; 19(2):117-24.
MeSHAdolescent
Adult
Aged
Bronchodilator Agents
Child
Double-Blind Method
Drug Synergism
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating
Humans
Loratadine
Male
Middle Aged
Nasal Obstruction
Pruritus
Pseudoephedrine
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
Severity of Illness Index
Sneezing
Treatment Outcome
AbstractBACKGROUND: Antihistamines are first-line therapy for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR); however, an oral decongestant is often added to improve control of nasal congestion.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a tablet combining the nonsedating antihistamine desloratadine and the decongestant pseudoephedrine was more effective than either drug administered alone in reducing the symptoms of seasonal AR, including nasal congestion.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind study, participants (N = 598) with symptomatic seasonal AR were administered either a combination tablet of desloratadine 2.5 mg/pseudoephedrine 120 mg (DL/PSE) bid, a desloratadine 5.0 mg qd and a placebo tablet, or pseudoephedrine 120 mg bid. Participants assessed their symptom severity twice daily over the 2-week treatment period.
RESULTS: The primary variable to assess the effects of the antihistamine component--mean change from baseline in average AM/PM reflective total symptom score (TSS), excluding nasal congestion--was significantly greater (-6.54) for DL/PSE than for desloratadine (-5.09) or pseudoephedrine (-5.07) monotherapy (P < .001 for both). The primary variable to assess the effects of the decongestant component--mean change from baseline in average AM/PM reflective nasal congestion score--was also significantly greater (-0.93) for DL/PSE than for desloratadine (-0.66) or pseudoephedrine (-0.75) (P < .001 vs desloratadine; P = .006 vs pseudoephedrine).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that DL/PSE therapy was more effective in reducing symptoms of seasonal AR, including nasal congestion, than the individual components when administered alone, thus supporting use of this combination in participants with symptomatic seasonal AR and prominent nasal congestion.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed ID19476015