Unbound MEDLINE

Sirolimus and everolimus induce endothelial cellular senescence via sirtuin 1 down-regulation: therapeutic implication of cilostazol after drug-eluting stent implantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology [J Am Coll Cardiol] Journal article

 
TitleSirolimus and everolimus induce endothelial cellular senescence via sirtuin 1 down-regulation: therapeutic implication of cilostazol after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Author(s)Ota H, Eto M, Ako J, Ogawa S, Iijima K, Akishita M, Ouchi Y 
InstitutionDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
SourceJ Am Coll Cardiol 2009 Jun 16; 53(24):2298-305.
MeSHAspirin
Cell Aging
Down-Regulation
Drug-Eluting Stents
Endothelium, Vascular
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III
Oxidative Stress
Paclitaxel
Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Sirolimus
Sirtuins
Tetrazoles
Ticlopidine
Vasodilator Agents
AbstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of paclitaxel, sirolimus, and everolimus on the senescent phenotype in human endothelial cells, and to further investigate possible involvement of mammalian sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) down-regulation as a mechanism.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial cell senescence may play a role in impaired re-endothelialization after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Recently, the down-regulation of Sirt1 has been shown to mediate oxidative stress-induced endothelial senescence.
METHODS: Senescent human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were judged by senescence-associated beta-galactosidase assay (SA-betagal), morphological appearance, and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1.
RESULTS: Treatment with paclitaxel, sirolimus, and everolimus significantly caused a senescent phenotype and PAI-1 up-regulation, associated with a decrease in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and Sirt1 expression. Overexpression of Sirt1 or Sirt1 activation reversed the sirolimus- or everolimus-induced senescent phenotype. Interestingly, paclitaxel-induced senescence was not suppressed by Sirt1 overexpression, suggesting the existence of a different mechanism. Cilostazol markedly inhibited the sirolimus- or everolimus-induced senescent phenotype (sirolimus or everolimus [2.5 nmol/l]; 49.2% or 53.0% SA-betagal positive vs. only 13.6% or 14.6% with cilostazol [100 micromol/l]) and PAI-1 up-regulation, but had no influence on the effects of paclitaxel. Finally, aspirin significantly blunted sirolimus- or everolimus-induced senescence, but neither ticlopidine nor clopidogrel had any effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus and everolimus induce endothelial senescence involving down-regulation of Sirt1. In contrast, the development of endothelial senescence by paclitaxel involves a Sirt1-independent pathway. Because sirolimus and everolimus are involved in Sirt1 modulation, cilostazol rescues HUVEC from sirolimus- or everolimus-induced senescence. These results may have therapeutic implications in the clinical sequelae after DES implantation.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed ID19520256
  
Advertise on this site.