Unbound MEDLINE

Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics [Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop] Journal article

 
TitleFluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
Author(s)Chin MY, Sandham A, Rumachik EN, Ruben JL, Huysmans MC 
InstitutionDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. mervchin@yahoo.com
SourceAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53.
AbstractINTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the fluoride-release profiles and caries lesion development in an enamel model with brackets cemented with 4 orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride exposure.
METHODS: Four orthodontic adhesives (Ketac Cem mu, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany; Fuji Ortho LC, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; Light-Bond, Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, Ill; and Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were used. Brackets were bonded on bovine enamel with each adhesive (n = 10) and subjected to alternate cycles of demineralizing (pH 4.55) and remineralizing (pH 6.8) solutions. Unbracketed enamel samples served as a reference. Five samples from each group were immersed in a fluoride mouth rinse (250 ppm fluoride) for 1 minute each day (test groups). Fluoride release was measured at regular intervals over 28 days. The mineral distribution of peribracket enamel after 28 days was quantified by transversal microradiographs.
RESULTS: Fluoride-release profiles of Ketac Cem mu, Fuji Ortho LC, and Light-Bond were high for the first 24 hours and reached a constant level after 2 weeks. Fuji Ortho LC released significantly more fluoride than did the other adhesives in both the control and test groups (P <0.01, repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni test). Enamel bonded with Fuji Ortho LC had significantly shallower lesions and less mineral loss (P <0.01, 2-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD).
CONCLUSIONS: Bonding of orthodontic brackets with Fuji Ortho LC resulted in less peribracket enamel demineralization with and without daily fluoride rinsing, mainly due to its better fluoride-release profile. In contrast, Transbond XT and Light-Bond offered few cariostatic effects to the enamel.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed ID19815157
  
Advertise on this site.