Unbound MEDLINE

High Rates of Survival, Immune Reconstitution and Virologic Suppression on Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) [J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr] Journal article

 
TitleHigh Rates of Survival, Immune Reconstitution and Virologic Suppression on Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa.
Author(s)Fox MP, Ive P, Long L, Maskew M, Sanne I 
InstitutionFrom the *Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University, Boston, MA; daggerHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; double daggerClinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; and section signRight to Care, Johannesburg, South Africa.
SourceJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009 Oct 15.
AbstractTo determine rates of survival, viral suppression, and immunologic change after 1 year on second-line antiretroviral therapy, we conducted a cohort study among 328 patients initiated on zidovudine, didanosine, and lopinavir/ritonavir. All patients who switched to standard second-line therapy at a large urban public-sector clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa, were included. A year after initiating second-line therapy 243/313 [78%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 73%-82%], subjects were alive and in care. Further, 203/262 (77%; 95% CI: 72%-82%) had a suppressed viral load by 1 year. Mean CD4 gain by 12 months was 133 cells/muL (95% CI: 106-160). Patients on second-line therapy had a small decreased likelihood of being alive and in care by 1 year [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.97] as time-matched comparisons on first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Patients switched before 2 viral loads >1000 (HR 1.68; 95% CI: 1.08-2.61), and those switched for reasons not related to noncompliance with first-line (HR 1.83; 95% CI: 1.14-2.93) were more likely to achieve virologic suppression by 1 year on second-line ART. As rates of treatment failure over the first year on second-line therapy were low, provision of second-line treatment to patients who fail their first-line ART should be considered a high priority in resource-poor settings.
LanguageENG
Pub Type(s)JOURNAL ARTICLE
PubMed ID19838128
  
Advertise on this site.