Unbound MEDLINE

Lower bispectral index values in children who are intellectually disabled. Anesthesia and analgesia [Anesth Analg] Journal article

 
TitleLower bispectral index values in children who are intellectually disabled.
Author(s)Valkenburg AJ, de Leeuw TG, Tibboel D, Weber F 
InstitutionDepartments of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.valkenburg@erasmusmc.n
SourceAnesth Analg 2009 Nov; 109(5):1428-33.
MeSHAdolescent
Anesthesia, General
Anticonvulsants
Case-Control Studies
Child
Child, Preschool
Consciousness
Duodenoscopy
Electroencephalography
Female
Gastroscopy
Gastrostomy
Humans
Male
Mental Retardation
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Parasympatholytics
Pilot Projects
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Time Factors
AbstractBACKGROUND: Very few data are available on the use of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in children who are intellectually disabled. Epileptiform electroencephalogram activity, underlying cerebral pathology, or anticonvulsant/spasmolytic therapy might influence BIS monitoring. Our aim in this exploratory study was to first compare BIS values at 4 different stages of anesthesia between intellectually disabled children and controls. Our second aim was to investigate the discriminative properties of BIS between consciousness and unconsciousness for intellectually disabled children and for controls.
METHODS: Eighteen intellectually disabled children and 35 control children, aged 2-13 yr, were included. BIS values, landmark events, and standard monitoring values of vital functions were recorded throughout the whole procedure. The performance of BIS in distinguishing between a conscious and unconscious state was assessed from receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) BIS values for the intellectually disabled group were significantly lower than those for controls in the awake state (72 [48-77] vs 97 [84-98], P < 0.001), during stable intraoperative anesthesia (34 [21-45] vs 43 [33-52], P = 0.02), and during return of consciousness (59 [36-68] vs 73 [64-78], P = 0.009). The discriminative properties of the BIS monitor for the state of consciousness were comparable between the 2 groups according to the receiver operating characteristic curves. Nevertheless, the optimal cutoff BIS value for discrimination between conscious and unconscious state was 28 points lower for the intellectually disabled group.
CONCLUSIONS: We advise anesthesiologists to be alert to possible lower BIS values in intellectually disabled children. There is a risk that they will inadvertently misinterpret the state of consciousness in intellectually disabled children. New multicenter studies must find the optimal manner of evaluating (un)consciousness in intellectually disabled patients with documented and confirmed specific etiologies of their intellectual disability.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed ID19843782
  
Advertise on this site.