Unbound MEDLINE

Prognostic value of myocardial infarct size and contractile reserve using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology [J Am Coll Cardiol] Journal article

 
TitlePrognostic value of myocardial infarct size and contractile reserve using magnetic resonance imaging.
Author(s)Kelle S, Roes SD, Klein C, Kokocinski T, de Roos A, Fleck E, Bax JJ, Nagel E 
InstitutionDepartment of Medicine/Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany. kelle@dhzb.de
SourceJ Am Coll Cardiol 2009 Nov 3; 54(19):1770-7.
MeSHAged
Cardiotonic Agents
Cicatrix
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Diuretics
Dobutamine
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gadolinium
Germany
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Kaplan-Meiers Estimate
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Contraction
Myocardial Infarction
Netherlands
Odds Ratio
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
AbstractOBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the predictive value of myocardial infarct size assessed with late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in medically treated patients with chronic myocardial infarction relative to contractile reserve on low-dose dobutamine magnetic resonance (DSMR) for long-term event-free survival.
BACKGROUND: Information on the relative merits of scar tissue and contractile reserve to predict long-term prognosis in patients with chronic myocardial infarction is lacking.
METHODS: A total of 177 patients with known coronary artery disease and scar tissue on LGE MRI were enrolled. Left ventricular (LV) functional parameters at rest and during low-dose DSMR were assessed, and the wall motion score index was calculated.
RESULTS: Eleven patients (6.2%) suffered an event during follow-up (average 20.3 months). Infarct size was a stronger predictor of events than LV ejection fraction and LV volumes at rest and during low-dose DSMR. Myocardial infarct size was used to separate patients at high risk (spatial extent > or =6 segments, n = 98) from those at low risk (spatial extent <6 segments, n = 79) for mortality. In the subgroup of patients at high risk, transmurality of infarct was not a predictor of events. However, the presence of contractile reserve (n = 63) was associated with a significantly higher number of events (12.7%) compared with no change in wall motion score index (6.7%; n = 15; p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarct size on LGE MRI is a stronger predictor of clinical outcome than contractile reserve in medically treated patients with myocardial infarction. In patients with large myocardial scar, the presence of contractile reserve is more important for the prediction of events than scar tissue.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed ID19874990
  
Advertise on this site.