| Title | Techniques for cesarean section. | | Author(s) | Hofmeyr JG, Novikova N, Mathai M, Shah A | | Institution | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa. | | Source | Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009 Nov; 201(5):431-44. | | Abstract | The effects of complete methods of cesarean section (CS) were compared. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of intention to perform CS using different techniques was carried out. Joel-Cohen-based CS compared with Pfannenstiel CS was associated with reduced blood loss, operating time, time to oral intake, fever, duration of postoperative pain, analgesic injections, and time from skin incision to birth of the baby. Misgav-Ladach compared with the traditional method was associated with reduced blood loss, operating time, time to mobilization, and length of postoperative stay for the mother. Joel-Cohen-based methods have advantages compared with Pfannenstiel and traditional (lower midline) CS techniques. However, these trials do not provide information on serious and long-term outcomes. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 19879392 |
|
