| Title | C-11 acetate does not enhance usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating between focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma. | | Author(s) | Magini G, Farsad M, Frigerio M, Serra C, Colecchia A, Jovine E, Vivarelli M, Feletti V, Golfieri R, Patti C, Fanti S, Franchi R, Lodi F, Boschi S, Bernardi M, Trevisani F | | Institution | Dipartimento di Malattie Apparato Digerente e Medicina Interna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. | | Source | Clin Nucl Med 2009 Oct; 34(10):659-65. | | Abstract | PURPOSE OF THE REPORT: We assessed the usefulness of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and C-11 acetate PET (AC PET) in distinguishing hepatic lesions due to consequential disease (hepatocellular adenoma and malignant lesions) from focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) in patients at low risk of malignancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with 43 lesions were prospectively enrolled. The diagnostic work-up included Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Fine needle biopsy was performed if the imaging study was inconclusive. The work-up revealed 36 FNH and 7 consequential lesions (5 hepatocellular adenoma, 1 hepatoma, and 1 metastasis). All patients underwent FDG and AC PET. FDG PET with target/background ratio (T/Br) greater than 1.2 and AC PET with T/Br of less than 1.2 were considered positive test for consequential disease.
RESULTS: On FDG PET, we had 6 true-positive out of 7 lesions due to consequential diseases, with a sensitivity of 85.7%, and 33 true-negative out of 36 lesions with FNH, with a specificity of 91.7%. Using AC PET, there were 2 true-positive lesions out of 7 caused by neoplasms, with a sensitivity of 28.6%, and 34 true-negative lesions out of 36 FNH, with a specificity of 94.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: When the goal is differentiating FNH from liver neoplasms, AC PET offered no additional diagnostic advantage over what is achieved with FDG PET. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 19893396 |
|
