| Title | Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite: comparison of the quad-helix and removable plate. | | Author(s) | Ranta R | | Institution | Department of Pedodontics and Orthodontics, University of Helsinki, Finland. | | Source | ASDC J Dent Child 1988 Mar-Apr; 55(2):102-4. | | MeSH | Child
Comparative Study
Female
Humans
Male
Malocclusion
Orthodontic Appliances
Palatal Expansion Technique
Retrospective Studies
| | Abstract | The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the quad-helix and removable plate with respect to effect and cost of treatment in the mixed dentition with unilateral forced crossbite. In the quad-helix group (25 children), expansion was accomplished with a prefabricated .036'' quad-helix soldered to bands on the maxillary molars. In the plate group (25 children), the removable plates had a midline screw and four Adams clasps. The screw was opened by one quarter-turn each week. The crossbite was eliminated in all cases in the two groups. The respective results in the quad-helix group and in the plate group (in brackets) were: intermolar arch width increased 3.6 mm (3.7 mm); the total period of appliance therapy averaged 3.8 months (21.6 months), ranging from 2 to 6 months (12-30 months); the number of visits averaged 4.6 (16.0), ranging from 3 to 6 (11-22); number of appliances needed averaged 1 (1.7), and the costs of the appliances averaged $58 ($174). In the plate group, the average values of the laboratory costs were 3-fold, the number of visits 3.5-fold, and the expansion and retention time 5.7-fold more than the quad-helix group. The present treatment rationale with the quad-helix appliance is easy, effective, cost-efficient, and can be learned by every pedodontitis for correction of unilateral crossbites in the mixed dentition. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Journal Article
| | PubMed ID | 3280631 |
|
